Legalnaija - Legalnaija

NBA Ikot Ekpene Branch honours Paul Usoro SAN

by Legalnaija | Apr 28, 2018 | Uncategorized

PAUL USORO, SAN IS HONOURED BY HIS HOME BRANCH, IKOT EKPENE BRANCH OF THE NBA AS THE PRINCE OF THE BRANCH, THE 1ST SAN FROM IKOT EKPENE SENATORIAL DISTRICT AND THE 2ND SAN FROM AKWA IBOM STATE.

Mr. Paul Usoro, SAN being presented with a Certificate of Honour by Hon Justice Joy Unwana (Akwa Ibom State High Court Judge) on behalf of the NBA, Ikot Ekpene Branch. The certificate is in recognition of Mr. Usoro, SAN’s special position as the first and only Lawyer from the branch that has been elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

Accessing the Investors’ Protection Fund of the Nigerian Stock Exchange | Adejorin D. Abiona

by Legalnaija | Apr 25, 2018 | Uncategorized

The Investors’ Protection Fund of the
Nigerian Stock Exchange (IPF) is a scheme set up by virtue of the provisions of
the Investments and Securities Act due to the activities of capital market
operators which sometimes endanger the interests of investors[i]. The primary aim of the Investors’
Protection Fund is to compensate investors who suffer pecuniary losses
resulting from some circumstances stated in ISA. This article examines the
Investors’ Protection Fund as it relates to investors accessing the said fund.

Administration of the Fund

The Investors’ Protection Fund is
administered by The Board of Trustees of The Nigerian Stock Exchange’s
Investors’ Protection Fund (“The Board”) subject to the regulatory supervision
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).[ii]

Purpose of the Fund as it Relates to
Investors

The purpose for establishing the investor
protection fund is to protect investors in Capital Market by compensating those
who suffer pecuniary loss arising from any of the following[iii]:

(a) Insolvency, Bankruptcy or Negligence:

The fund shall be used to compensate
investors that suffer any loss arising from insolvency, bankruptcy or
negligence of a dealing member firm of a securities exchange or capital trade
point.

(b) Defalcation:

Defalcation refers a default, act of
embezzling, failure to meet an obligation, misappropriation of trust funds or
money held in any fiduciary capacity and failure to properly account for such
funds[iv]. Investors are protected
against defalcation committed by a dealing member firm or any of its directors,
officers, employees or representatives in relation to securities, money or any
property entrusted to, or received or deemed received by the dealing member
firm in the course of its business as a capital market operator.

(c) Revocation or Cancellation:

The Fund shall also be applied in
compensating persons who suffer pecuniary loss from the revocation or
cancellation of the registration of a capital market operator pursuant to the
provisions of section 38 of Investments and Securities Act which provides for
registration and regulation of capital market operators by the Security and
Exchange commission (SEC)

Who Can Access the Fund?

Every Investor with a dealing member firm of
the Nigerian Stock Exchange (“The Exchange”) who suffers pecuniary loss in any
of the circumstances stated above is entitled to claim compensation from the
investor protection fund.

Accessing the Fund

a. Submission
of Claim

A claim for compensation should be made in
the first instance to The Exchange or the IPF with all supporting documents. A
complainant must exhaust The Exchange’s complaint management procedure before
making a claim from the IPF[v].

The claim should be the amount of the actual
pecuniary loss suffered by him including the reasonable cost of disbursement
incidental to the making and proving of his claim less any amount or other
benefits received or receivable by him from any source other than the investor
protection fund in reduction of the loss[vi].

Documents needed in support of a claim[vii]

i. Copy
of share subscription form

ii. Contract
Notes

iii. Receipt
issued by Firm

iv. Account
Opening Form

v. Acknowledgement
letter from the firm

vi. Central
Securities Clearing System (CSCS) transaction history statement

vii. CSCS
client account statement

viii. Bank
Statement

ix. Copy
of Cheque issued/ bank draft

x. Registrar’s
statement of transaction,

xi. Shares
allotment letter from registrars

xii. Copy
of share certificate,

xiii. Letters
of Administration/ Probate (in the case of an estate)

xiv. Company
incorporation documents (copy of certificate of incorporation, particulars of
directors statement of share capital).

xv. Means
of identification e.g. driver’s license, international passport, national
identity card, bankers confirmation etc.

xvi. Such
other documents evidencing identity and ownership over shares.

Where the claim of an investor is rejected,
such Investor may institute an action to compel payment at the Investments and
Securities Tribunal[viii].

b. Verification

The Exchange shall verify every claim within
thirty (30) days after its internal process and determine the amount or extent,
if any, to which the claim shall be allowed. Payment shall only be made based
on verified claims in accordance with the Investors’ Protection Fund Rules and
the provisions of the Investments and Securities Act[ix].

c. Payment

Payment shall be made when it has been
satisfied by evidence that[x]:

i. the investor has a claim against a Dealing
Member;

ii. the investor has duly applied for
settlement of its claim from the Dealing Member;

iii. the Dealing Member is unable to satisfy
the claim within a reasonable period;

iv. the investor has exhausted The Exchange’s
internal complaint resolution procedure;

v. the investor has duly applied for
compensation from the Fund; and

vi. The Exchange has verified the claim.

Amount of Compensation Payable

The maximum compensation payable to an
investor is an amount that is determined by the Board from a written policy
from time to time. The maximum amount payable set by the Board in 2015 is
N400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Naira) per Claimant[xi].

Where the loss is less than the maximum
amount fixed by the Board at any given time, the investor may be paid the full
amount of the loss, less any amount or value of all monies or other benefits
received or receivable by him from a source other than the Fund in reduction of
the loss[xii].

In addition to any compensation, the investor
is also entitle to interest at the rate of five per cent per annum calculated
from the day upon which a claim arose and continuing until the day upon which
the claim is satisfied[xiii].

Conclusion

Many investors suffer financial losses from
activities such as market manipulation, misrepresentation, false trading and
negligence of some capital market operators and as such, it is quite important
to adequately protect them. The IPF as examined above provides a form of
protection to this Investors and it is commendable that the Nigerian government
subscribes to this.

It is however noteworthy that the IPF is
different from the NIPF. While the IPF compensates aggrieved investors for
losses enumerated above, the SEC established the National Investor Protection
Fund (“NIPF”) in line with its powers under of the ISA [section 13(k)] to
compensate investors whose losses are not covered by the IPF.

References

[i] Section
197, Investments and Securities Act, 2007.

[ii] Ibid

[iii]
Sections 197, 212, Investments and Securities Act, 2007.

[iv]
Section 315, Investments and Securities Act, 2007; Chief Livinus Ezemegbe v.
The Nigerian Stock Exchange & Anor. 2006 Legalpedia SEC CV80

[v]
The Nigerian Stock Exchange Investors’ Protection Fund: Frequently Asked
Questions retrieved from
http://www.nse.com.ng/regulation-site/becoming-an-investor/FAQs on February 11,
2018; Section 213, Investments and Securities Act, 2007.

[vi]
Section 213 (6), Investments and Securities Act, 2007

[vii]
The Nigerian Stock Exchange Investors’ Protection Fund: Frequently Asked
Questions supra

[viii]
Chief Livinus Ezemegbe v. The Nigerian Stock Exchange & Anor supra

[ix]
Section 213, Investments and Securities Act, 2007. Paragraph 4.01,
The Nigerian Stock Exchange Investors’ Protection Fund Rules retrieved from
http://www.nse.com.ng/regulation-site on February 11, 2018

[x] Paragraph
4.02, The Nigerian Stock Exchange Investors’ Protection Fund Rules supra

[xi]
NSE Press release dated August 5, 2015 retrieved from
www.nse.com.ng/mediacenter/pressreleases/pages/IPF-Set-to-Compensate-Investors
on February 11, 2018

[xii]
Paragraph 4.04, The Nigerian Stock Exchange Investors’ Protection Fund Rules
supra

[xiii]
Section 213 (7), Investments and Securities Act, 2007

Adejorin David Abiona

Associate at Tokunbo Orimobi LP

Source – LinkedIn

IP ABC: Patenting Your App/Software | Infusion Lawyers

by Legalnaija | Apr 25, 2018 | Uncategorized

Question of the Week (1)

We are a tech
company in Nigeria. We have just finished building an app—first of its kind in Africa. Because we have
big plans for this app, we need to protect it. Since the app has an
innovative and intuitive technology, we want patent protection. How do we
go about getting a patent in Nigeria?

Answer

You want to patent your new and intuitive app
in Nigeria.

In Nigeria—and most countries—apps are eligible for copyright
protection only, not patent.

This is because apps are software programs and software programs are
categorized as literary works under the Nigerian Copyright Act. They are
literary works because software programs are written in computer language
(whether source code or object code). The fact of their being written is what
makes them literary, thus their functionalities are immaterial.

The implication of the position above is that your company cannot
successfully apply for patent at the Trademarks, Patents & Designs Registry
in Nigeria. Patents are granted to protect new scientific and
technological inventions only, not software programs. So while your app may
have “innovative and intuitive” capabilities, the Patents and
Designs Act—which applies to inventions in Nigeria—does not
recognize software programs as subjects of patent.

Note that the only
way your app can be eligible for patent in Nigeria is if the app has any
functional or technical features that is new and inventive since patent
protects technical or functional features in a product or process, not just any
product or process.

But if your app does
not contain this feature, it cannot be patented. At best, it can only be
copyrighted since software is a ‘literary work’ by virtue of being written or
expressed in computer language. (Copyright is not concerned with the functional
or technical feature of your app, if it contains any functional and technical
features.)

Patenting Your Software outside Nigeria

Because you have “big plans” for
your app, you may consider patenting your app in other jurisdictions,
particularly the marketplaces you wish to expand to. In Europe and the United
States for instance, software patents are legally acceptable, but subject to
certain requirements. In Europe, the European Patent Office (EPO)
treat software programs as computer-implemented inventions and requires
that to qualify for patent, the software program or computer-generated
invention must solve a technical problem in a novel and
non-obvious manner. In the US, patent law does not permit
granting software patent that contains abstract ideas.

To help your company navigate this typically technical software-patent matter,
consult an IP lawyer or law firm.

Best wishes

IP ABC

Via Infusion Lawyers

Image Credit – www.pixabay.com

The Place of Pupillage and Mentorship in the Future of Legal Practice in Nigeria | Paul Usoro SAN

by Legalnaija | Apr 23, 2018 | Uncategorized

“The
topic ” The Place of Pupillage and Mentorship in the Future of Legal
Practice in Nigeria” is very hot because the standard appears to be
falling and most people equates pupillage with housemanship.

Pupillage is not exactly the same
as Mentorship. Pupillage simply means understudying a person in order to better
your knowledge and understanding of legal practice. Mentorship on the other
hand is a platform for junior lawyers to look up to the senior lawyers
to guide them. Mentorship is not formal like pupillage. A mentor shows you the
pothole to avoid and the things to know so as to have a successful practice.

Pupillage is a mandatory
programme for the training of barristers in the UK. In Nigeria we have a
fused practice. Our pupillage must be able to accommodate the transaction and
litigation aspect of our legal practice. Mentorship is voluntary and does not
form part of the qualifying process. It has no formal arrangement like
Pupillage.

The essence of both Pupillage and
Mentorship is to improve the standard and quality of lawyers in legal practice.

If our Pupillage programme is
going to be part of the qualifying process, then it should be regulated by the
Council of Legal Education.

The firms that the young lawyers
will be attached must be firms with a certain standard. Standard must be set
and maintained for our firms.

The issue of minimum wage during
pupillage is an issue that must be factored elaborately. I support mentorship as
well as pupillage because it helps you to build a successful and sustainable
practice as mine. I served here in Makurdi at the Law Firm of George Uloko
& Co. I was not paid big money but the foundation of what I am today
was built here in Makurdi.

The basis of our profession is
seniority/respect. Our Juniors must learn how to respect the senior lawyers and
should not see all of them as unworthy of emulation. The bar we should build
must be an inclusive bar that has a place for the junior lawyers to grow with
respect for the senior lawyers “

2018 Career Training For Lawyers – 3 Days To Go

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

The Creative Industry in Nigeria is one of our greatest exports to the world. The Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Sector contributed 2.3% (NGN239biliion) to Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2016.

According to ‘PWC’, the North American sports industry is expected to reach $73.5 billion by 2019 and the Nigerian Sports Industry also has enormous potential as well.

These industries require more lawyers with the requisite competence to service its legal framework and players. Participate in the Career Training For Lawyers and give your legal career the boost it deserves while improving your competence in the Entertainment, Sports and Creative Industry.

Modules include Entertainment Law, Sports Law, Mediation, Forensic Document Examination, Intellectual Property Law and Finance for Lawyers.

The details of the training include –

Date – 26th and 27th April, 2018

Venue – LCCI Conference & Exhibition Centre, Nurudeen Olowopopo Drive, Alausa, Ikeja

Time – 9am – 5pm daily

REGISTRATION

Fee per delegate: N30,000

ACCOUNT DETAILS–

Lawlexis International Limited

Fidelity Bank

4011176564

Note that all Payment confirmation and Delegate Information should be sent to lawlexisinternational@gmail.com or call 08055424566.

#RegisterNow #LegalCareer #LegalTraining

Sexual Assault by Penetration

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

Section 259 of the Criminal
Law of Lagos State, provides that;

“Any person who penetrates
sexually the anus, vagina, mouth or any other opening in the body of another
person with a part of his body or anything else, without the consent of the
person is guilty of a felony and liable to imprisonment for life.”

This offence is known as
sexual assault by penetration and it means that the following acts are
punishable, under that section;

1. A
man (or woman) forcibly penetrating the body of his/her spouse, sexually. This
is referred to in some countries as spousal rape.

2. Forcible
sexual penetration of a member of the same gender.

3. The
sexual assault need not involve the genitals, to violate the provisions of this
section as penetration with objects, (so long as it done in a sexual manner) is
now clearly included.

4. This
offence also covers an unwelcome sexual penetration of the anus, mouth or any
other opening in the body of the victim. Anal rape for instance, is now be
punishable under this section, in Lagos State.

Please note that this
offence is punishable with life imprisonment; same as rape.

It is important to note that
as of today, as far as this writer knows, this provision has only been enacted
in Lagos State (there is a similar provision in Section 1 of the Violence
Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015, (VAPPA) which defines rape to include
all acts included in Section 259 of the Lagos law. But this law is applicable
only in Abuja).

In other states, the
Criminal Code/Penal Code, provides for rape and defines it to mean the unlawful
penile penetration of the vagina, without the real consent of the victim. These
laws do not recognise for instance, spousal rape, anal rape or even same gender
sexual violence. All these fall under indecent assault which is punishable with
three years imprisonment (in the case of a male victim) and two years
imprisonment, in the case of a female victim. The punishment for these, in this
writer’s opinion, is not enough to serve as punishment or a deterrent, for the
commission of these offences. This is so because, penile-vagina rape is
punishable with life imprisonment, under the Criminal and Penal Codes. It is
therefore inexplicable, that other forms of sexual violence, subject of this
discourse, and in which the victim is supposedly in a similar or even worse
situation than the victim of penile-vagina rape, carry such a negligible term
of years, as punishment.

One of the applaudable
innovations of the VAPPA, is that Section 1(4) thereof provides that a register
for convicted sexual offenders shall be maintained and made accessible to the
public. This will not only serve to deter the commission of sexual offences,
but will also help to protect any prospective victim from falling prey, since
background checks can now be done on persons. It will be very beneficial, if this
provision can be enacted and implemented by all states of the Federation.

In conclusion, since sexual
offences come in different forms, our laws must recognize this and be dynamic,
to ensure that justice is served, at every material point in time. It is the
writer’s wish that other States begin to amend/alienate their criminal laws, so
as to ensure adequate protection for victims of sexual assaults, that adequate
punishment is meted out to offenders and to ensure ultimately, the safety of
lives and dignity of all, living within their jurisdictions.

Zeniath Abiri

Abiri & Mustafa

Source – LinkedIn

Dissolution Of Marriage Contracted Under Islamic Law | Zeniath Abiri

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

There
are two major ways through which a marriage contracted in line with Sharia or
Islamic principles, can be dissolved, which are;

1. Talaq
and

2. Khul’u.

In
view of the fact that the second method of dissolution of marriage is less
discussed and consequently, less known in this part of the world when compared
to Talaq, focus shall be on Khul’u in a bid to shed more light on the subject..

The Khul’u System of
Dissolution of Marriage.

Khul’u
means the dissolution of a marriage, usually on the giving of something
of value, by the wife, to the husband. It is initiated at the instance of the
wife, against her husband, where she is so unhappy in her marriage, or the
relationship between her and her husband, is so strained, that a harmonious
relationship between them, as spouses, is impracticable. Certain scholars take
the position that for Khul’u to be effective, the dissatisfied wife may, as
consideration for the divorce, surrender the dowry and other material gifts,
where necessary, to her husband, to compensate him for his material losses. The
husband on the other hand, may, if he likes, waive his right to compensation,
and simply agree to divorce her. Once Khul’u occurs, it is an irrevocable form
of divorce. This system of divorce is sometimes referred to as ‘Khula’.

The
most well-known story that references khul’u and serves as the basis for legal
interpretations, is the story of Jamilah, the wife of Thabit ibn Qays:

1. Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The wife of Thabit bin Qais
came to the Prophet (PBUH) and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! I do not blame
Thabit for defects in his character or his religion, but I, being a Muslim,
dislike to behave in un-Islamic manner if I remain with him.” On that
Allah’s Apostle (PBUH) said to her, “Will you give back the garden which
your husband has given you as Mahr (dowry)?” She said, “Yes.”
Then the Prophet (PBUH) ordered to Thabit, “O Thabit! Accept your garden
and divorce her once.” See http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=63&translator=1&start=0&number=197

There
are two principal ways for a wife to achieve divorce through Khul’u;

(i) She
informs her husband that she no longer wishes to remain in marriage with him;
and requests that he divorce her.

(ii) If
her husband is not willing to grant her a divorce, the wife is well within her
rights in Shariah, to approach a Sharia Court and present her divorce case to the
Kadi (Shariah Court Judge) The Judge would then summon the husband and ask him
to declare a divorce upon his wife and free her from the marriage. If the
husband for any reason refuses, the Sharia Judge,
irrespectively, may declare a divorce between the husband and the wife of the
marriage, if he is satisfied that peaceful coexistence in matrimony, cannot be
achieved by the parties.

Once
the wife expresses her desire to exercise her right under Khul’u, two
circumstances may arise,

1. Both
the husband and wife mutually decide to divorce or the wife wants it, and
certain conditions are agreed upon, between the couple. In this case, the
couple need not have recourse to law, as it is enough to meet these conditions,
and then for the couple to pronounce that they are now divorced from each
other.

2. A
wife wants it, but the husband is reluctant, and insists on the subsistence of
the marriage, despite the wife’s resentment to it. In this latter case, the
wife may proceed to the Sharia Court, and have her petition for the grant of
khul’u, heard. The following questions must be resolved;

– Can
anything be done at all, to salvage the marriage?

– Is
the wife entitled to such separation? If so, under what circumstances?

– Can
the Khadi (a judge of the Sharia Court) dissolve the marriage, despite the
husband’s insistence on its continuance?

· Because
the laws of khulʿu in particular cannot be found in the Qur’an
directly, a Sharia court
judge must discern from Hadith and Islamic jurisprudence historical cases what
they believe to be valid reasons for this system of divorce. See Macfarlane,
Julie Islamic Divorce in North America: A Shari’a Path in a Secular
Society Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2012, p. 168-9.

In
Usman v Usman (2003) 8 NWLR (Pt. 208) 253 CA @ pp 129 – 130 paragraphs H – D,
the wife requested a divorce due to cruel conduct by the husband. The
husband refused to agree to the divorce and the Kadi dissolved the marriage and
ordered the wife to refund the estimated amount of the bridal gift and marriage
expenses. The Court of Appeal affirmed the divorce.

It
must be noted that a kadi cannot compel a wife seeking divorce through khul’u,
to explain her reasons. Though it is desired that she does, it is enough for
her to state that she is discontented with her marriage and is no longer
interested in continuing with the marriage relationship. The kadi will
grant divorce, if he is satisfied that harmonious co-existence between the
couple is no longer feasible or the continuance of the union is strongly
resented by the wife, and/or that the couple would transgress the bounds of
Allah, if the divorce is not granted.

Issues that are Usually
Considered, Upon a Petition for Khul’u.

Compensation:

While
many scholars agree that the man is not entitled to more than the initial
amount of dowry (mahr/dower), given to the wife at the time of celebration of
the marriage, others do not think he is entitled to any compensation at all
while a few think he is entitled to more, especially where the wife has
attained a certain higher social status or is in a better financial standing,
by reason of the marriage. But what has been applicable in Nigeria, is that the
woman returns the dowry along with other wedding gifts, given to her, by her
husband. A considerable number of scholars have said the principle of
compensation is to apply, only when the husband is not at fault. They base this
idea on the fact, that Islamic law does not help the transgressor or wrong
doer, and that the law leans in favour of the party who is less at fault. I
tend to agree more with this group of scholars.

Another
scenario that occurs under this head, is where the unwilling husband to
divorce, requests an unreasonable financial compensation, as in the case of Usman
v Usman (supra), where the husband was requesting for half a million Naira
as compensation.

Custody:

· Usually,
the issue of custody of the children of the marriage, is resolved in favour of
the woman. The man is still expected to provide child care and support, unless
the woman declines this and can afford to care for the children, without their
father’s help. Once a child is old enough, he is given the choice of
determining who has custody. See Welchman, Lynn (1998). Women and
Muslim Family Laws in Arab States: A Comparative Overview of Textual
Development and Advocacy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam
University Press p. 121.

Iddah:

When
a woman is granted a divorce through khul’u, she is required to enter a waiting
period, known as iddah. The waiting period (usually three months), is observed
before she can remarry, to ascertain whether she is pregnant and where she is
found to be pregnant, avoid controversy as to the paternity. If the wife who
has successfully exercised her rights under the khul’u system, finds that she
is pregnant, she must be delivered of the baby before she can be totally free
to remarry. See Tucker, Judith E. (2008). Women, Family, and Gender in
Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, p. 100-101.

Another
way through which a woman may divorce her husband, in islam, is known as tafwid.
It is a less common system in Nigeria and involves the husband handing over the
power of divorce, to his wife. He may use words like, “I permit you to divorce
yourself from me” or “I hand over to you, the power of divorce”. The wife,
where she accepts it, is expected to say immediately (or a short time
thereafter, but no longer than the next day), “I divorce myself from you”. This
option is usually exercised by the husband, where he does not want the society
to look down on him, for divorcing his wife. It may also be exercised by him,
when the wife requests for it. In the latter case, it becomes a form of khul’u.

In
conclusion, though many may not know this, the khul’u system of divorce is the
most common form of divorce in areas where the Sharia Law is applicable, in
Northern Nigeria. See Nasir, Jamal J (2009). The
Status of Women Under Islamic Law and Modern Islamic Legislation.
Brill. p. 130 ISBN9789004172739.

Zeniath Abiri

Abiri & Mustafa LP

Source – LinkedIn

Photo Credit – www.muslimvillage.com

7 Times Mfon Usoro Lawyers Female Table Tennis Champion Shares Her Experience, Says Paul Usoro Is A Pathfinder NBA Needs

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

I have heard people speak about
Paul Usoro SAN as regards his passion to develop the legal profession through
sponsorship of different capacity programmes, some of which challenge the legal
mind, and others are sporting activities which not only challenge the mind and
body, but create relaxation and promote friendship amongst lawyers. I am well positioned to
speak on his involvement in the area of sports, having won the females’ gold
medal and trophy at the MFOM USORO LAWYERS’ TABLE TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIP (An annual
lawyers table tennis competition sponsored by Paul Usoro SAN since 2009) for
seven consecutive times.

Table tennis is a passion I nurtured from childhood. I attempted
to develop it to a competitive level then. I needed to go to school but
couldn’t put sports and schooling together. ”Hey, you can’t eat your cake and
have it”, i was told. So I dropped table tennis for school.

While in UNIBEN in 1995, during the West Africa Universities
Games (WAUG) hosted by the school that year, I won a bronze medal in the
females’ doubles in the game and thought that was about the closest I could
come to expressing myself in this area I love so much.

You can then imagine my delight when in 2009, Paul Usoro put
smiles on my face (and that of many other colleagues) by creating a platform
for lawyers to interact in this manner. I have always known that this was
necessary since sports is life, but I never thought anyone could conceive, let
alone birth such an idea in this our otherwise conservative ”fit and proper”
professional environment. I would ordinarily jump at any opportunity for a game
of table tennis without incentives.

Paul Usoro however tied mouth-watering prizes ranging from Law
Reports, Sports Kits, Cash Prizes and Return Ticket to International Bar
Association (IBA) Conferences to it. So, I have everything to play for and
nothing to lose. Thank you Paul Usoro, for giving me the opportunity to eat my
cake and still have it.

Apart from the sponsorship, what amazes me year in and out is
the personality of Paul Usoro and his wife, so much humility and courteousness.
We get treated each time like kings and Queens that sometimes, i get confused
as to who is doing who a favour.

The NBA today is in need of a president that is sensitive to the
welfare of its members. A president that would go to the core to ignite, re
establish and redefine the essence of the association to center around the
lawyer.

NBA is in need of a pathfinder, one who would think outside the
box to open up new frontiers of opportunities to the lawyer (like he did in his
specialized area of practice) and protect existing ones from incursion. A
president who sincerely loves the profession and has demonstrated his sincerity
and commitment to its progress even when political office was not contemplated.
Need I say more?

TITILAYO OMOBOLANLE OSAGIE ESQ.
7 TIMES FEMALE CHAMPION (2010 – 2016)
MFON USORO LAWYERS TABLE TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIP

Source – www.thenigerianlawyer.com

Paul Usoro, SAN: A Commitment to the Welfare and Empowerment of Young Lawyers

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

Everyone that works is deemed worthy of his pay. This is pretty much an accepted fact in various circles; religious; professional and even in the most informal of settings. This much is apparent to young lawyers who seek to make a name for themselves in the legal profession. This is an issue close to the heart of Paul Usoro, SAN.

As a matter of practice and personal conviction, Paul believes in and is committed to youth empowerment, diversity and inclusion. A few life examples:

New hires in PUC being post NYSC enjoy six figures start salaries (minimum of N150,000.00) and are encouraged to tap into the sustainable growth scheme of the firm.
Young Lawyers benefit from the Firm’s annual Profit Sharing and Bonus schemes.
Of the 5 Partners in PUC, we will mention 2 partners to demonstrate Paul’s investment in the mentorship and growth of young lawyers:
- Mr Muniru Liadi, a Litigation Partner progressed from entry level post youth service to the position of a Partner.
- Mrs Adetola Bucknor Taiwo, a Transaction Partner joined PUC 2 years post call and made partner after 6 years in the firm.
Youth Corpers posted to the Firm take home a minimum of N50,000.00 monthly and Law School interns have a N20,000 farewell allowance.
For nine (9) years and counting, PUC sponsors the Lawyers’ Table Tennis Open (Mfon Usoro Cup), nicknamed the largest sporting event among lawyers. LTTO is a Table Tennis tournament open to lawyers from within and outside Lagos. Travel and accommodation cost for out-of-town lawyers are underwritten by PUC. Prizes include fully paid return flight ticket to the International Bar Association (“IBA”) Conferences and other attractive prizes for 2^nd and 3^rd positions.

MALE CATEGORY			FEMALE CATEGORY
RANK	NAME	BAR BRANCH	RANK		BAR BRANCH
2017
1st	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	1ST	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
2nd	RAPHAEL IPINYOMI	IBADAN	2ND	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
3rd	KABIR ADELEKE	LAGOS	3RD	SISAN EZEIKPE	LAGOS
2016
1st	KABIR ADELEKE	LAGOS	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2nd	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	2^ND	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
3^rd	ADEYINKA ADEREMI		3^RD	TAOFIKAT ODUNUGA
2015
1^ST	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	KABIR ADELEKE	LAGOS	2^ND	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
3^RD	OLUSEGUN FABUNMI	IKEJA	3^RD	ZAINAB OLABODE-SHODUNKE	LAGOS
2014
1^ST	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	OLUSEGUN FABUNMI	IKEJA	2^ND	SUSAN EZEIKPE
3^RD	KABIR ADELEKE	LAGOS	3^RD	ANNE AIMUA
2013
1^ST	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	ADEYINKA ADEYEMI		2^ND	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
3^RD	KABIR ADELEKE	LAGOS	3^RD	GANIAT ALLIU
2012
1^ST	ADEYINKA ADEYEMI		1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	2^ND	SUSAN EZEIKPE
3^RD	WOLE ODUWOLE	3^RD	3^RD	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
2011
1^ST	ODUWOLE OLAWALE	LAGOS	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	MOSHOOD ABDULLAHI		2^ND	YETUNDE MARTINS	IKEJA
3^RD	TUNJI ABDULHAMEED	LAGOS	3^RD	SUSAN EZEIKPE
2010
1^ST	OLUSEGUN FABUNMI	IKEJA	1^ST	TITILAYO OSAGIE	IKEJA
2^ND	ADEDAYO OSHODI		2^ND	SUSAN EZEIKPE
3^RD	ONYEKA ANIONWU
2009
1^ST	LEKAN IJELU	IKORODU
2^ND	DAYO OSHODI
3^RD	LOOKMAN AGBOOLA
1^ST	LEKAN IJELU	IKORODU

Consistency in Supporting NBA and Nigerian Lawyers
It is notable that all the activities highlighted in this write-up predate Paul’s decision to contest for the presidency of the Nigerian Bar Association. His life and actions demonstrate consistency, propelled by genuine altruism. A visionary leader with the right temperament to unify all.

Source – www.barfirst360.com

COMMUNIQUE OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE YOUNG LAWYERS FORUM HELD ON THE 20TH OF APRIL, 2018

by Legalnaija | Apr 22, 2018 | Uncategorized

COMMUNIQUE OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE YOUNG LAWYERS FORUM HELD ON THE 20TH OF APRIL, 2018 AT THE NIGERIAN LAW SCHOOL AUDITORIUM, LAGOS STATE

Preamble:

At the Annual General Meeting of the Young Lawyers’ Forum summoned by the Wada Ahmed Wada led governing council of the Young Lawyers’ Forum slated for 3pm the members of the Young Lawyers’ Forum gathered at the venue and waited for about 2hours. There was no communication from the Executives or any of the members of the Governing Council as to the position of the AGM.
At about 5pm it became obvious that the Chairman, Wada A. Wada and his team had deliberately boycotted the meeting and the 13 Branch Chairmen present moved that the meeting be called to order.

Consequently, Mr. Richarmond O. Natha-Alade, the Branch Chairman of the Young Lawyers’ Forum, Ibadan Branch, drew the attention of the members to Article 17 of the Nigeria Bar Association Uniform Bye Law which empowers the AGM to appoint a member to act in the absence of the Chairman or the Secretary or any member of the Governing Council of the YLF.

Pursuant to the above provision and in strict compliance with the NBA Constitution, Mr. Bolaji Adeoye, the Branch Secretary of YLF, Ibadan Branch, thereafter moved a motion that Mr. Charles Ajiboye of the Ikeja Branch be appointed to preside as the Chairman at themeeting. Mr. Ageherario Emamanuel of Warri Branch seconded the motion moved by Mr. Bolaji Adeoyefollowing which the AGM resolved and appointed the said Charles Ajiboye as the Chairman while Mr. Oghenevwarhe Ohwonohwo, Chairman Efurun Branch was equally appointed as the secretary for the purpose of the meeting.

It was proposed and resolved by a motion moved by Joseph Asawa of Port-harcourt and supported by Mr. Paul, the Chairman of Katsina Branch YLF, that the meeting proceeded as the Annual General Meeting of the Young Lawyers Forum. However, Mr. Okon of EpeBranch moved a counter motion that the meeting should proceed as a mere meeting of members rather than as AGM which was supported by Ezekiel Olugbenga.

To reach a resolution, a vote was taken in which 64 persons voted in support that the meeting be constituted as the AGM of the Young Lawyers Forum while only 2 persons voted in support of the counter motion that it be a mere meeting.

Accordingly, the meeting commenced as the AGM of the YLF following which Mr. Chairman proposed the Agenda for the AGM for adoption as follows:

1. Opening Prayer

2. Constitutional Review Committee

3. Succession Plan of Executives

4. AOB

5. Adjournment

6. Closing Prayer.

Mr. Jude Tejiri of Oleh Branch moved for the adoption of the Agenda and was seconded by Anderson Djegbada of Warri Branch. The Agenda was thereafter adopted.

Constitutional Review Committee:

Following an informal meeting of Chairmen of branches the day before with the National Executives of YLF wherein it was agreed that the YLF makes representation to the Constitution review committee, the house deliberated on several areas of concern.

Mr. Chairman then called for nomination of members to constitute a committee that will be charged with the responsibility of drawing up a memorandum to be sent to the NBA Constitution Review Committee headed by Mallam Yusuf Ali, SAN, to address issues bothering on the welfare of young lawyers and other areas of concern in the NBA constitution under review.

The following persons were nominated and adopted by the AGM as the members of the committee and charged with the responsibilities of drawing up a memorandum and a proposal to be sent to the NBA constitutional review committee within 14days from the day of their appointment. The said appointed members are:

1. Eigbe Alright – Ibadan Branch

2. Djegbada Anderson – Warri Branch

3. Lucky Nwosu – Jos Branch

4. John Afolabi Ogedengbe– Ilorin Branch as chairman of the committee

5. Wakili Gambo – Gombe Branch

6. Dogbajale Memunah – Lagos Branch as secretary of the committee

7. Benjamin Nwosu

Succession Plan of the Executives:

At the deliberations of the above agenda, Mr. KanuStephen of the Ibadan Branch drew the attention of the AGM to the fact that the tenure of the current leadership of the YLF would lapse at the end of July, 2018 and the need to make provisions for succession in order not to have a vacuum could not be under estimated. The house discussed the need to put the Forum in order and implement the NBA constitutional provision for the election of its leaders.

In his contribution, Mr. Richarmond O. Natha-Alade, of the Ibadan Branch pointed out that the AGM, pursuant to Article 17(d) can take far reaching decisions including but not limited to the elections of its principal officers and urged the AGM to proceed immediately with the elections of its principal officers in accordance with the law.

The house considered the various reactions and thereafter a motion was formally moved and seconded by Mr. KanuStephen of the Ibadan branch and it was thereafter resolved as follows:

1. That a Vote of No Confidence be passed on the current national leadership of the Young Lawyers Forum led by Wada Ahmed Wada for act of gross misconduct for their deliberate refusal to participate in the AGM which formed part of the Annual Young Lawyers Summit held in Lagos – an AGM they called for.

2. That an Electoral Committee be constituted by the AGM to fashion out modalities for election into National Executive Offices of the Young Lawyers Forum.;

3. That a communiqué be issued to the public and a letter to the Executives of NBA regarding the outcome of the AGM.

Vote of No Confidence:

In line with the resolution to pass a Vote of No Confidence, several comments were taken on the embarrassment and disregard by the Chairman, Wada Ahmed Wada and his executives. Actual votes were then taken to formalize the motion wherein an overwhelming majority voted in support of the Vote of No Confidence while only 1 person against it. Having taken the votes, Mr. Kanu Stephen moved a formal motion for the Vote of No Confidence and seconded by Binta Salam of Lagos Branch and a vote of no confidence was thereafter passed. The vote was to the effect that they be sanctioned by the National Executives of the NBA for their irresponsible actions.

Electoral Committee:

Pursuant to a prior resolution that an Electoral Committee be set up, the presiding Chairman then called for nominations of persons to be constituted as members of the Electoral Committee, following which the following persons were nominated and thereafter appointed as members of the Electoral Committee of the Young Lawyers’ Forum by the AGM:

1. Akintunji Akinyemi – Ikeja Branch as chairman of the committee

2. Chisom Chude – Okah Branch as the Secretary of the Committee

3. Agherario Emmanuel – Warri Branch

4. Samuel Okon – Epe Branch

5. Ggbande Terve Paul – Katsina Branch

The terms of reference include; to specifically come up with clear guidelines for the elections as well as to ensure that the elections are conducted at an Annual General Meeting to be held during the 2018 Annual General Conference of the NBA before the NBA AGM.

Adjournment:

After fruitful deliberations, Mr. Samuel Okon of EpeBranch moved for the adjournment of the AGM to the Annual General Conference of the NBA but before the AGM of the NBA Annual General Conference which was seconded by Kanu Stephen.

Closing Prayer:

The closing prayer was said by Deliverance Falaye of Ikeja Branch at about 8pm.

Mr. Charles AjiboyeMr. Oghenevwarhe Ohwonohwo

Presiding ChairmanPresiding Secretary

« Older Entries

Next Entries »