by Legalnaija | Jan 22, 2025 | Blawg
In 2023, we hosted the Annual conference of the International Law Association-Nigerian Branch at the court of arbitration Lagos Nigeria where Edward Kwakwa delivered a very insighful key note address and Prof.@Bayo Ojo SAN, founder Bayo Ojo & Co and former Attorney General of the Federation honoured us with his presence at the presidential dinner which held at the galaxy hall of the serene and highly delectable Four Points by Sheraton Victoria Island Lagos.
In 2024, we repeated once again, and hosted to an elevated standard the 7th Annual Conference cum 10th Anniverary of the formation of the ILA-NG; an event which held at the Abuja Continental Hotel(formerly Sheraton) where Dr Jumoke Oduwole then at PEBEC and now the Minister of Industry and Trade Federal Republic of Nigeria delivered a very detailed and higly-celebrated keynote address on “Public Private Partnership and International Law: Building Blocks for Sustainable Infrastructure Financing”, thereafter, we hosted attendees of the conference to a posh presidential dinner where Dr John Kayode Fayemi, PhD. a former Governor of Ekiti State, was a distinguished guest during the Presidential Dinner which held same…
This year 2025, we are set to host an explosive and world-class 8th Annual Conference of the International Law Association Nigerian branch with the theme ” Fostering Trade and Investment Integration For Sustainble Development:The Role of International Law” an event scheduled to hold at the precints of the highly serene and widely acclaimed Afe Babalola University Ado Ekiti(Abuad) on the 9th-10th April 2025 and a league of distinguished panelist and speakers are invited.
A former Nigerian head of State and former President(1999- 2007) Gen. Olusegun Aremu Mathew Obasanjo GCFR and other distinguished guests, not forgetting Dr. Olumide Ayeni SAN FCIArb has confirmed their avalability and the 5000 capacity ABUAD hall has been equipped to host both the physical attendees and those that will join virtually.
The conference is convened by the President ILA-NG, His Excellency, Prof. Damilola S. Olawuyi, SAN, FCIArb, a highly revered diplomat and international lawyer, who through his humillity, unassuming intelligence and connections gathers men of class and brains together in a room and the ambience and convivial atmosphere of the event centre will live with you for a life time..Lest i forget, the ILA events of 2023 and 2024 was anchored by the highly-sought-after and my woman crush Shola Soyele , Judiciary correspondent Channels TV and whenever Sholz is on the podium at any legal or social events, happiness flows; her tone of voice and girly body makes the event more colourful…
Register now to secure your seat under the early bird category: https://lnkd.in/dkPDz8y8
Peter Ndubuisi Akpu Esq, ACIS, Managing Partner GREENAGE ATTORNEYS LLP and Secretary Central Planning Com’tte ILA-NG Conference 2025
by Legalnaija | Jan 22, 2025 | Uncategorized
INTRODUCTION
A company may decide to restructure its corporate outlook after its incorporation; this might either be as a result of the company’s financial state or due to depletion in the company’s economic growth.[1] Company restructuring may be internal or external. Internal restructuring options include; share consolidation; increase or reduction of share capital; arrangement and compromise under section 710 of CAMA, 2024 while external restructuring options include; Amalgamation or merger; take over; Acquisition, Arrangement on sale and Purchase and Assumption[2]. This article focuses on Mergers and Acquisition.
MERGERS
Section 119 of Investment and Securities Act defines ‘merger’ to mean any amalgamation of the undertakings or any part of the undertakings or part of the undertakings of one or more companies and one or more bodies corporate. In simple words, a merger is the coming together of two or more companies to form a single corporate entity.
ACQUISITION
An acquisition is an arrangement whereby one company acquires the controlling holding of shares in another company. In simple words, an acquisition occurs when one company acquires sufficient shares in another company such that it acquires control of the other company[3]. An acquisition may be initiated either by a take-over bid or by purchasing shares in the market. In most cases, the acquired company is usually a smaller company and becomes a subsidiary of the acquiring company.
OVERVIEW AND IMPORTANCE OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITION IN NIGERIA
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) are instrumental to corporate restructuring, enabling businesses to achieve growth, diversify, or gain competitive advantages. In Nigeria, M&A plays a significant role in the corporate landscape, particularly as companies seek to navigate a complex and competitive economy. These transactions, however, are governed by a legal framework designed to ensure transparency, protect stakeholders, and maintain competitive balance in the market.
The direct government intervention in the economy due to recapitalization in sectors like banking, insurance and aviation has led to increase in mergers in the country.
Importance of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Nigerian Economy
- Increase in scale of production by greater specialization in plant and marketing economy through a reduction in advertising costs and distribution outlets.
- It enhances corporate growth in the economy.
- It boosts confidence in the market.
- It enhances more and efficient reallocation of resources.
- It provides a level ground for companies interested in merging regardless of their financial state.
- It gives rise to healthy market competition thereby improving the quality of products and services delivered.[4]
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR MERGERS AND ACQUISITION IN NIGERIA
- Corporate and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020
The Corporate and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) is the principal law regulating companies in Nigeria[5]. Under CAMA, the legal procedures for corporate restructuring[6], including mergers and acquisitions, are clearly defined. CAMA requires companies to follow specific statutory procedures, including the passing of resolutions by shareholders, obtaining necessary approvals, and filing requisite documentation with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC). CAMA also provides protections for minority shareholders, ensuring that their interests are safeguarded during such transactions.
- Investments and Securities Act (ISA) 2007
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), established under the ISA, also plays a critical role in M&A regulation in Nigeria. SEC approval is mandatory for many M&A transactions, particularly where public companies are involved or where securities are exchanged as part of the transaction. SEC ensures that M&A transactions are conducted transparently, with proper disclosure of material information to protect investors and other stakeholders[7].
- Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA) 2018
The FCCPA established the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC), which oversees competition and consumer protection in Nigeria. One of the core functions of the FCCPC is to regulate M&A transactions to prevent anti-competitive practices. Section 93 (4) of the FCCPA provides that mergers above a certain threshold must be notified to the FCCPC for approval. The FCCPC evaluates M&A deals to ensure that they do not substantially lessen competition, create monopolies, or harm consumers.
- Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) Rules
For companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, additional rules apply. The NSE requires listed companies to comply with disclosure obligations, including the need to announce merger or acquisition deals, provide updates to the public, and disclose relevant financial and operational information. This ensures market transparency and investor protection.
- Bank and Other Financial Institution Act (BOFIA)
This act regulates the Central Bank of Nigeria and other financial institutions by providing general guidelines for them.
REGULATORY AGENCIES INVOLVED IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
- Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC)
CAC is charged with responsibilities of issuing certification of corporate resolution, deregistration of companies dissolved.
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Every merger acquisition or external restructuring between or among companies shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the Commission. Approval for mergers, acquisition or external restructuring shall be given if, the Commission finds that;
- Such acquisition, whether directly or indirectly, of the whole or any part of the equity or other share capital or of the assets of another company, is not likely to cause substantial restraint of competition or tend to create monopoly in any line of business enterprise;
- The use of such shares by voting or granting proxies or otherwise shall not cause substantial restraint of competition or tend to create monopoly in any line of business enterprise
- Though the contemplated merger is likely to restrain competition, one of the parties to the merger has proved that it is failing[8].
- Federal High Court
Section 251 of the constitution vests in the Federal High court the powers to adjudicate issues regarding companies.
- Nigerian stock Exchange
Nigerian Stock Exchange provides the platform in Africa for raising capital. It facilitates a thriving secondary market for trading securities and maintains a seamless flow of market information.
- Central Bank of Nigeria(CBN)
CBN is charged with the responsibility of administering the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA), 2020, with the sole aim of ensuring high standards of banking practice and financial stability through its surveillance activities, as well as the promotion of an efficient payment system.
- Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission
The Commission evaluates mergers and acquisitions in Nigeria to ensure that they do not significantly diminish competition in the relevant market.
Categories of Mergers
There are three (3) categories of Mergers based on the threshold set by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC)[9], these categories are;
- Small Merger
Section 95 (1) (a) of Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 classified a ‘small merger’ as a merger that does require a notification to the commission unless, within the six month period from implementation of the merger, as the commission is of the opinion that the merger may substantially prevent or lessen competition.
- Intermediate Merger
An intermediate merger according to section 120 (1) of ISA is merger or a proposed merger with a value between the lower and upper thresholds of 500,000 and 5,000,000 respectively.
- Large Merger
Section 120 (1) of ISA defines a large merger as a merger with a value at or above the upper threshold of 5,000,000.
Forms of Merger
There are three (3) forms of merger according to Rule 227 of SEC Rules. They include;
- Horizontal Merger
This is a form of merger involving direct competitors i.e companies operating in the same market level and selling the same products or providing same services[10].
- Vertical Merger
This is a form of merger involving companies with no competitive relationship. Although the companies involved operate in the same market, they do not sell products or offer services in the same market level[11].
- Conglomerate Merger
This is a form of merger involving unrelated companies[12].
Procedures for Mergers and Acquisition under ISA and SEC Rules
- The merging companies would first internally make a merger proposal to their separate boards to consider and approve.
- It is encouraged that the legal representatives of the merging companies conduct due diligence exercise to determine and confirm the status of the merging companies.
- The merging companies shall file with the Commission, a merger notification for the commission’s evaluation.
- An application is then made to the court by any of the merging companies to sanction the scheme.
- The court will order that all merging companies hold separate meetings with majority of its members representing not less than ¾ in value of shares of members being present and voting either in person or by proxy at each of the separate meetings.
- Where ¾ in value of shares of members being present and voting either in person or by proxy agree to the scheme at the separate meetings, it shall be referred to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for approval.
- Upon receiving the approval of the scheme from the merging companies, SEC shall investigate to find out if the scheme is likely to cause a substantial restraint or enable a monopoly.
- If the merger involves transfer of shares or any class of shares in a transferor company and not less than 9/10 in the value of the shares involved, the transferee company may at any time within two months after the expiration of the four months compulsorily acquire the shares of the dissenting shareholders.
- If SEC approves the scheme, any of the merging companies will apply to the court to sanction the scheme.
- The merging companies are to comply with post-approval requirements[13].
Requirements for Merger Notification[14]
The merger notification shall be filed by submitting a report containing the following to SEC;
- a letter of intent signed by the merging companies accompanied by board resolutions of the merging companies supporting the merger;
- a detailed Information Memorandum of the proposed transaction including all the background studies relating to the merger, and justification for it which shall include the following:-
- detailed information about product lines or operations of the companies;
- a list of the major competitors in that product market and the market position or market share of each company;
- the structure and organization of the companies;
- revenue information about the operations of the companies;
- an analysis of the effect of the transaction on the relevant market including the post transaction market position of the merging or resultant company;
- additional information to be disclosed/contained in an information memorandum which shall include the following:
- State the products or services that the merging entities sell or provide in, into or from Nigeria. In addition, identify any products or services that you believe are considered by buyers as reasonably interchangeable with, or a substitute for, a product or service provided in, into or from Nigeria by parties to the merger;
- For each identified product or service, state the geographic area (s) in Nigeria, in which the merging entities sell;
- For each identified product or service, identify and provide contact details of the top five producers or providers in each identified geographical area with the largest estimated turnover in value, and their estimated share of the total turnover during the last financial year;
- For each identified product or service, state the turnover in each of the identified geographical area during the last financial year;
- For each identified product or service, identify and provide contact details for the merging entities’ five customers in each of the identified geographical area with the largest aggregate purchases in value during the last financial year;
- The business relationship among the merging entities in terms of the products or services they sell to one another as well as the value of those products and services sold during the last financial year.
- The note shall also indicate whether the merger will involve the following:
- Transfer of all or part of the assets, liabilities, undertakings, including real and intellectual property rights;
- Transfer of shares or other interests.
- Where a company involved in the merger transaction claims that it is failing, the following documents shall be forwarded:
- Financial information demonstrating that the firm will be unable to meet its financial obligations in future;
- Information indicating that the failing firm would reasonably be expected to exit the market unless the merger is implemented.
- The latest financial statement of the companies;
- Certificate of the corporation of the merging companies.
- Where a party to a small merger is required by the Commission to notify it of the merger, documents forwarded shall be the same as those required for a merger notification:
- Extract of board resolutions of the merging companies authorizing the merger duly certified by a director and the company secretary;
- A copy of the letter appointing the Financial Adviser(s);
- Copy of certificate of incorporation certified by the company secretary;
- CAC certified true copy of particulars of directors and allotment of shares;
- Letter of no object from company’s’ regulators.(where applicable); 276 SEC Rules; June 2013
- The audited accounts of the merging entities for the preceding five (5)years or the number of years any of the companies have been in operation if less than five (5)years;
- Applicable merger notification fee of N50,000 (fifty thousand naira) per merging company (for intermediate and large mergers);
- In the case of an intermediate or large merger a copy of the merger notification shall be forwarded to:
- Any registered trade union that represents a substantial number of its employees; or the employees concerned or representatives of the employees concerned, if there are no such registered trade unions.
- Additional information to be disclosed in the Information Memorandum includes:
- The actual and potential level of import competition in the relevant industry;
- The ease of entry into the industry, including tariff and regulatory barriers;
- The level and trends of concentration and history of collusion in the relevant industry;
- The degree of countervailing power in the market; v. The dynamic characteristics of the relevant industry including growth, innovation and product differentiation;
- The nature and extent of vertical integration in the relevant industry; vii. Whether the business or part of the business of a party to the merger or proposed merger has failed or is likely to fail; viii. Whether the merger will result in the removal of an effective competitor;
- Any other information that the Commission may require in respect of the Merger.
- Merger applications may be filed by separate financial advisers (registered as an issuing house) or solicitor registered with the Commission for each of the merging companies, provided that in case of a small merger one (1) financial adviser may be used[15].
Key Legal Issues in M&A Transactions
- Due Diligence
Before concluding M&A transaction, it is important that the merging companies conduct thorough due diligence. This process involves a detailed review of the target company’s legal, financial, and operational standing. Legal due diligence ensures that the company complies with all applicable laws, has clear title to its assets, and is free of significant liabilities. Failure to conduct comprehensive due diligence can result in significant post-transaction risks.
- Shareholder Approval
The Securities and Exchange Commission is charged with the responsibility of ensuring that ¾ of shareholders agree to the M&A before a mergers and acquisition scheme is approved[16].
In the case of mergers, CAMA mandates that the shareholders of both merging companies pass special resolutions approving the merger. Minority shareholder protection is also a key consideration, as dissenting shareholders can object to the transaction and may be entitled to a buyout or other remedies as ordered by the court.
- Regulatory Approvals
M&A transactions above certain thresholds must obtain approval from regulatory bodies such as the FCCPC and SEC[17]. In sector-specific industries, additional approvals from regulators like the CBN may be required. The process involved in securing these approvals can slow down the transaction, adding to the complexities of the process.
- Contract Issues
The negotiation and drafting of M&A agreements are key legal steps in the process. It is important that M&A Agreements include representations and warranties of parties, conditions precedent and indemnities. It should also provide for Post-closing obligations, such as earn-out provisions or non-compete agreements, are also common in M&A deals. This ensures there is no ambiguity in the roles and obligations of parties in the merger.
- Employment and Labor Considerations
When companies merge, the employees of the target company are often affected. The Nigerian labor laws, including provisions under the Labour Act, ensure that employees are treated fairly during corporate restructuring. Mergers and acquisitions may result in redundancies or changes to employment contracts, and companies must comply with these regulations to avoid labor disputes[18].
- Tax Implications
Tax efficiency is a critical consideration in M&A transactions. Companies must consider the tax obligations arising from the transaction, including capital gains tax, value-added tax (VAT), and company income
- Competition Law and Antitrust Concerns
FCCPC evaluates M&A transactions in Nigeria to ensure that they do not create monopolies or substantially reduce competition in the market. Companies involved in anti-competitive mergers may face penalties, and the transaction could be blocked or reversed[19].
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are vital tools for corporate restructuring in Nigeria, allowing companies to enhance their growth, competitiveness, and market presence amidst a challenging economic landscape. Governed by a robust legal framework, including the Corporate and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) and the Investments and Securities Act (ISA), these transactions require careful adherence to regulatory approvals, shareholder agreements, and due diligence processes to ensure compliance and protect stakeholder interests. M&A can take various forms, including mergers, acquisitions, and amalgamations, and are categorized based on their financial thresholds, emphasizing the need for strategic planning to optimize resource allocation and market position. Ultimately, successful M&A activities can stimulate economic growth, improve market confidence, and foster healthy competition, contributing to the overall stability and development of the Nigerian economy.
[1] Corporate Law Practice in Nigeria, Samuel A. Osamolu at p. 399
[2] Ibid at p. 399-400
[3] Legal Framework on Mergers and Acquisitions by Professor C. O Okonkwo accessed on 7th October, 2024 at https://www.cbn.gov.ng/out/publications/bsd/2005/legal%20framework%20for%20mergers%20%20acquisitions.pdf
[4] Corporate Law Practice in Nigeria, Samuel A. Osamolu at p.410
[5] Section 8, CAMA, 2020
[6] Section 710- 717 CAMA, 2020
[7] Section 119-130, ISA ACT, 2007
[8] Rule 423, SEC RULES 2013.
[9] Section 93 (4) Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018
[10] Rule 421, SEC RULES, 2013.
[11] Ibid
[12] ibid
[13] Part XII of the Investment and Securities Act (ISA) No. 29, 2007, Part I of the Rules & Regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission 2013 (as amended)
[14] Section 426, Part I of the Rules & Regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission 2013 (as amended)
[15] Section 426, Part I of the Rules & Regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission 2013 (as amended)
[16] Part I of the Rules & Regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission 2013 (as amended)
[17] Section 427, Part I of the Rules & Regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission 2013 (as amended)
[18] Section 20, Labour Act, 1974
[19] Mergers Review Guidelines, Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission,2020
Via www.aocsolicitors.com.ng
by Legalnaija | Jan 22, 2025 | Uncategorized
INTRODUCTION
In Nigeria, the landscape of employee compensation is shaped by combination of statutory provisions, industry practices, and economic factors. Understanding the legal consideration and the practical realities surrounding employee compensation is essential for both employer and employee. The employee compensation Act, of 2010, is a social; security/welfare scheme that provides comprehensive compensation to employees who suffer from accidents at the workplace or in the course of employment. The basis or justification for compensation is the employer’s duty of care.
Compensation under employment refers to the total rewards that employees receive in exchange for their labor and services. It encompasses both direct and indirect forms of payment and serves as a critical element of human resource management (Adair & Satyanarayana, 2018). Compensation impacts employee performance, motivation, and satisfaction, making it an essential component for organizational effectiveness.
Employee Compensation
Employee compensation serves as a critical aspect of labor law, aimed at ensuring that Employees receive adequate financial and healthcare support when they suffer workplace injuries or illnesses. In Nigeria, the Employees’ Compensation Act (ECA) of 2010 stands as a primary legislative framework to provide an equitable system of compensation for employees in the case of work-related accidents, injuries, and diseases. The Act replaced the earlier Workmen’s Compensation Act (WCA) due to its limitations and narrow focus, extending coverage to a broader scope of employment situations and types of injuries (Deloitte Corporate ServicesLimited [DCSL], 2012).
Components of Compensation
Compensation is generally divided into two primary types: direct compensation and indirect compensation.
Direct compensation includes monetary rewards such as base salary, bonuses, commissions and profit-sharing schemes. These financial incentives are designed to recognize and reward individual performance, aligning employee efforts with organizational goals (Adair & Satyanarayana, 2018). Indirect compensation, on the other hand, consists of non-monetary benefits, such as health insurance, retirement benefits, and paid leave. These benefits enhance job satisfaction and contribute to overall employee well-being by addressing various personal needs (Brown, 2003). Theories Related to Compensation, Several theories provide a foundation for understanding compensation' s impact on employee behavior. Reinforcement theory, proposed by B.F. Skinner, suggests that behavior can be motivated by rewards. When high performance is followed by positive reinforcement, such a monetary reward, employees are more likely to repeat this behavior in the future (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018). Expectancy theory, developed by Victor Vroom, highlights that employees are motivated by expected rewards and are more likely to perform if they believe their efforts will lead to desired outcomes (Harrison & Liska, 2008). Finally, equity theory, introduced by John Stacey Adams, posits that employees assess fairness in their compensation by comparing their input-output ratio with that of others. Fair and competitive compensation packages can therefore enhance job satisfaction and reduce turnover (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018).
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Nigeria’s labor laws are primarily governed by the Labor Act, which sets the foundation for employment relationships. The Act outlines provisions related to wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and termination procedures. In addition, the Employee Compensation Act of 2010 specifically addresses compensation for work-related injuries, disabilities, or death, establishing a framework for employer liability in such cases. The Employees’ Compensation Act, 2010, was signed into law on 17th December 2010. This Act repeals the Workmen’s Compensation Act Cap. W6 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and makes comprehensive provisions for payment of compensation to employees who suffer from occupational diseases or sustain injuries arising from an accident at the workplace or in the course of employment. Guidelines for the Release of Staff in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry 2019 issued further to the provisions of the Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulations 1969 (as amended), made under the Petroleum Act, Cap P10, LFN 2004 (now the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021); Nigeria Data Protection Regulation 2019 issued by the National Information Technology Development Agency.
Categories of compensation
- Compensation for death
In the event that an employee dies in an occupational accident or of an occupational disease, the family members are paid: a funeral allowance and a pension. Persons considered to be family members are specified in the Workers’ Compensation Act. Notably, the provision of section 7 of the Act widens the scope of liability of an employer to the employee, providing that:
Section 7 (1) Any employee, whether or not in a workplace, who suffers any disabling injury arising out of or in the course of employment shall be entitled to payment of compensation by Part IV of this Act.
(2) An employee is entitled to payment of compensation concerning any accident sustained while on the way between the place of work and:
(a) The employee’s principal or secondary residence
(b) The place where the employee usually takes meals; or
(c) The place where he usually receives remuneration provided that the employer has prior notification of such a place.
Scale of Compensation: The scale of compensation for an injury, disease, or death suffered in the course of employment is provided under Part IV of the Act. Section 17 of the Act provides for compensation in fatal cases, stating that where death results from an injury of an employee, compensation shall be paid to the dependents of the deceased. The compensation paid to the employee’s widow (err) or children ranges from 30% – 90% of the employee’s total monthly remuneration as of the date of death, although this is dependent on the circumstances of the dependents. Section 17 – 25 of the Act. Where the compensation offer is accepted, this further bars the affected employee or his siblings from instituting any legal action against the employer in respect of the same subject matter.
Employer’s Liability: Employers are held liable for providing compensation to employees affected by work-related incidents. The Act specifies the obligations of employers in promptly reporting accidents, facilitating medical examinations, and ensuring compliance with the compensation process. Section 5 of the Act
Establishment of the Employees Compensation Fund: The legislation mandates the creation of the Employees Compensation Fund, managed by the Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF). The fund serves as the financial pool from which compensation payments are made to eligible employees. Section 56 – 63 of the Act
Compensation Administration: The Act establishes the administrative structure for the implementation of the compensation scheme. This includes the role of the NSITF in managing the fund, adjudicating claims, and overseeing the overall compensation process. However, more recent studies by Nnedinma Umeokafor, over an 11-years period [2002-2021], found that of the reported accidents: 80% occurred at night; manufacturing of rubber products accounted for the highest number of injuries at 53.8% for death. Sections 31 and 32 of the Act
One notable achievement is the clear articulation of the compensation process, providing a structured mechanism for addressing work-related incidents. The legislation establishes a no-fault compensation scheme, shifting the focus from attributing blame to swiftly compensating employees. This is a positive departure from traditional legal processes that could be protracted and adversarial. In Nigeria there is a dearth of accurate information involving fatalities arising from work injuries. One responsible cause is the underreporting of cases by private business and government agencies. However, according to Ezenwa A.O, between 1987 and 1996, the annual case fatality rate ranged from 0.94 per 100 injured workers 1990 to 5.41 in 1994 with an overall fatality rate of 2.23 per 100 injured workers.
- Compensation for injury:
It is common for workers to suffer injury or incur liabilities during the course of employment. This is more common with employee’s whose employment requires them to work with delicate and complex medium and heavy duty machinery, such as workers on an oil rig, a manufacturing company, a laundry service or even a restaurant.
The Act provides in section 7, that:
. Any employee, whether or not in a work place, who suffers any disabling injury, occurred, as the Act provides other instances when the employee will be liable to compensation for injury suffered.
The Act provides in subsection {2} that:
“An employee is entitled to payment of compensation with respect to any accident sustained while on the way between the places of work. In c & c const. co Ltd. V. okhai {2003} 18 NWLR [pt.851]79, the respondent, while on duty which involved the serving of the appellants crane sustained grievous injuries arising out of the 2nd appellant failure as switch operator to use due care thereby causing the crane to become agitated and resulting in a drum of the crane to rollover violently over the respondents’ left foot, crushing that leg below the knee. For this he was under great pain and suffering for which he was hospitalized and this eventually led to the amputation of that leg. The employee was awarded damages for loss of earning capacity, future loss and damages for pain and suffering.
Impact of Compensation on Employee Performance
Compensation is not only a reward but also a tool for driving employee performance. Research suggests that competitive compensation packages attract and retain high-performing employees, contributing to organizational success (Pearce, 2010). Employees who feel adequately compensated are more likely to exhibit higher levels of motivation, engagement, and productivity (Brown, 2003). Moreover, when compensation is linked to performance, such as through merit pay or profit-sharing programs, employees become more focused on achieving organizational objectives (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018).
For example, merit pay, a common performance-based compensation method, has been shown to encourage employees to meet or exceed performance benchmarks. Profit-sharing plans, though more indirectly tied to individual performance, foster a sense of ownership and alignment with organizational goals among employees (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018). However, to maximize these effects, compensation systems must be thoughtfully designed to balance financial incentives with intrinsic motivators, ensuring sustained employee motivation an minimizing unhealthy competition within the workplace (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018).
The Nigerian Employees’ Compensation Act of the Nigerian Employees’ Compensation Act, 2010 (ECA) offers a legal framework for compensating employees who suffer injuries, disabilities, diseases, or death as a result of their employment. This Act, enacted to replace the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1987, aims to protect employees through a structured compensation scheme. The ECA aims to create an "e; open and fair system of guaranteed and adequate compensation for all employees or their dependants" in instances of death, injury, disability, or illness arising from the course of employment (DCSL, 2012).This compensation includes not only financial benefits but also rehabilitation services, which extend to both physical and mental health support. Unlike the WCA, which had a narrow focus primarily on physical injuries, the ECA covers mental health issues directly linked to traumatic workplace events or ongoing workplace conditions. For instance, mental stress is considered compensable if it results from a traumatic event in the workplace, making this legislation comprehensive in its approach to employee welfare (DCSL, 2012).
Objective of the Act
The primary purpose of the ECA is to provide compensation for employees who suffer from work-related injuries, diseases, or fatalities. Anushiem and Oamen (2017) explain that the Act intends to provide a more inclusive and effective compensatory regime, which was a significant departure from the employer-friendly nature of the repealed Workmen’s Compensation Act. The ECA aims to create a balanced framework benefiting both employees and employers, with specific objectives outlined in Section 1 of the Act. These objectives include ensuring fair compensation for injuries, establishing a compensation fund, and creating mechanisms for rehabilitation and prevention (Anushiem & Oamen, 2017). How the Nigerian Employees’ Compensation Act 2010 Transmits to Compensation Under Employment. The Employee Compensation Act (ECA) of 2010 creates a structured way for Nigerian employees to receive compensation if they experience work-related death, injury, disease, or disability. It translates into an employment compensation framework by mandating financial protection measures that employers must implement. Here's how this framework transmits to practical compensation under employment:
- Mandatory Contributions: The ECA obligates all Nigerian employers (both public and private sector) to contribute 1% of each employee' s monthly salary to the Employee Compensation Fund. This fund is managed by the Nigerian Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF) Board and provides resources to compensate employees or their dependents in cases of workplace-related incidents.
- Compensation Coverage: Compensation under the Act applies if an employee experiences harm due to work activities. This includes: o Death: The Act mandates financial support for dependents of employees who pass away from work-related injuries. Section 17 specifies that dependents, such as spouses or children, may receive 30-90% of the deceased employee’s monthly remuneration, depending on their circumstances. O Injury and Disability: The Act provides for compensation to employees suffering from work-related injuries or disabilities that impact their ability to work. This allows affected employees to maintain financial stability while recovering or adapting to long-term changes in their work capabilities. o Disease: For work-related diseases, the Act ensures compensation for medical expenses and other costs arising from the diagnosis and treatment of conditions linked to employment.
- Legal Limitation on Further Claims: Acceptance of compensation under the ECA means that the employee (or dependents) agrees to forego any further legal claims against the employer for the same incident. This protects the employer from repeated liability and provides employees with an expedited, guaranteed source of compensation without lengthy legal battles.
Scope and Application of the Act
The ECA applies to both public and private sector employees in Nigeria, encompassing a broad definition of & quote; employee & quote; to include anyone under contract, whether oral or written, continuous, temporary, or part-time (Anushiem & Oamen, 2017). However, military personnel in non- civilian capacities are excluded from the Act’s protections. This broad coverage ensures that nearly all employees have access to compensation for injuries or diseases arising out of their employment.
Administration and Compliance Requirements
The Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF) Management Board is tasked with administering the ECA. Employers are mandated to contribute at least 1% of their total monthly payroll to the Employees’ Compensation Fund (ECF) within the first two years of the Act’s commencement. This fund is used to provide financial support and medical assistance to employees impacted by workplace injuries. The NSITF also has the discretion to adjust contribution rates based on the risk level associated with specific industries. Penalties are imposed on employers for non-compliance, including fines, penalties on unpaid assessments, or even imprisonment for responsible officers who neglect to make required contributions or provide payroll data (DCSL, 2012). Criticisms and Challenges of the ECA While the ECA represents a significant improvement over the WCA, several critiques exist. One major concern is the management of the ECF by the NSITF Board, which some argue lacks adequate transparency and efficiency. Another issue is the broad discretion given to the NSITF to adjust employer contributions, potentially leading to inconsistent assessments and unpredictability for employers. Moreover, unlike the WCA, the ECA does not provide a detailed schedule of compensations for various types of injuries and disabilities, which may lead to inconsistencies in compensation amounts and potential disputes between employers and employees (DCSL, 2012).
Despite the ECA’s progressive provisions, several operational issues still affect its effectiveness. Anushiem and Oamen (2017) highlight these key areas:
- Appeal Procedure: Section 55 of the ECA provides a unique appeal structure, where aggrieved employees must first appeal to the Nigerian Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF) Board before approaching the National Industrial Court. Critics argue that this procedure conflicts with fair justice principles because the Board acts both as a party and judge in initial appeals. Anushiem and Oamen (2017) argue that this could lead to partiality, proposing instead that a pre-action notice should replace the internal appeal requirement.
- Compensation for Mental Stress: Section 8 of the ECA covers compensation for mental stress but lacks a clear definition, leaving interpretation to the NSITF Board. This provision allows for compensation if mental stress is a direct reaction to a traumatic event at work. The ambiguity, however, may limit practical enforcement, as the Board has significant discretion to determine eligibility for mental stress compensation (Anushiem & Oamen, 2017).
- Occupational Diseases and Schedule Limitations: The Act lists compensable occupational diseases, yet it does not meet international standards, excluding several recognized conditions such as mental and behavioral disorders. Section 9 of the Act requires that these diseases must result in either death or disability for compensation eligibility. This limited list restricts the rights of employees suffering from unlisted conditions, potentially excluding valid claims (Anaheim & Oamen, 2017).
CHALLENGES AND REALITIES
However, the effectiveness of these laws faces challenges in practical implementation. Delays in the disbursement of compensation and disputes over the extent of liability are issues that need attention. The administrative hurdles and complexities in navigating the compensation process sometimes hinder the timely delivery of benefits to affected employees. Furthermore, the scope of these laws may need to advance to address the changing nature of work. The rise of non-traditional employment arrangements, such as gig work and freelancing, presents new challenges in defining employer-employee relationships and determining liability in the event of work-related incidents.
To enhance the impact of Employee Compensation laws in Nigeria, there is a need for strengthened enforcement mechanisms. This involves ensuring that employers are aware of their obligations and are held accountable for compliance. Furthermore, streamlined and efficient processes for filing and adjudicating compensation claims can contribute to a more expeditious resolution of cases.
Public awareness campaigns can also play a crucial role in informing both employers and employees about their rights and responsibilities under these laws. Improved awareness can contribute to a culture of safety in workplaces and empower workers to assert their rights when necessary.
Despite the existence of robust legal frameworks, several challenges persist in the realm of employee compensation in Nigeria. Enforcement of labor laws can be inconsistent, especially in smaller enterprises or informal sectors where oversight is limited. This inconsistency sometimes leads to exploitation and unfair practices, such as inadequate wages or denial of benefits.
Moreover, the complex nature of the labor market, including issues like contract work, outsourcing, freelancing, and gig employment, poses challenges in defining and ensuring fair compensation. The evolving nature of work requires continuous adaptation of legal frameworks to address emerging trends and protect the rights of all workers.
Conclusion
The Employees’ Compensation Act is a vital piece of legislation that addresses the shortcomings of its predecessor, offering an inclusive framework for compensating employees for a wider array of work-related injuries and conditions. While challenges remain in the administration and scope of the Act, it has undeniably advanced employee welfare in Nigeria, establishing a comprehensive system for workplace injury compensation. Compensation remains a central factor in employee satisfaction, motivation, and performance. A well-designed compensation strategy that aligns with industry standards and employee expectations can enhance employee productivity and loyalty. Thus, organizations must continuously assess their compensation systems to ensure they support both employee well-being and business objectives (Adari & Satyanarayana, 2018).
References
- Adair, T., & Satyanarayana, G. (2018). Impact of compensation on employee performance.
- Intercontinental Journal of Human Resource Research Review, 6(4), 1-7.
- Anaheim, M. I., & Oamen, P. E. (2017). Nigerian Employees’ Compensation Act 2010: Issues
- Arising. African Journal of Comparative and International Law, 1(1), 53-63.
- Brown, D. (2003). Reward strategies. Journal of Personnel Management, 1, 17-29.
- Deloitte Corporate Services Limited. (2012). A review of the Employees Compensation Act 2011.
- Harrison, D. A., & Liska, Z. (2008). Promoting regular exercise in occupational fitness Programs. Journal of Personal Psychology, 5(5), 27-45.
- Pearce, L. (2010). Managerial compensation based on organizational performance. Journal of industrial relation 52, 3-28
Via www.aocsolicitors.com.ng
by Legalnaija | Jan 22, 2025 | Blawg
Traditional institutions in Nigeria have long been pillars of community governance, conflict resolution, and social order. These institutions, led by chiefs, kings, and other traditional leaders, play a crucial role in maintaining law and order at the grassroots level. As modern legal systems evolve, the importance of integrating traditional structures into the broader framework of governance becomes increasingly evident.
Historical Context
Traditional institutions in Nigeria have existed for centuries, predating colonial rule. These institutions were responsible for administering justice, managing resources, and maintaining peace within their communities. They operated on customary laws, which were deeply rooted in the cultural and social norms of the people.
Conflict Resolution
One of the primary roles of traditional institutions is conflict resolution. Traditional leaders often act as mediators in disputes, leveraging their deep understanding of local customs and traditions. Their mediation processes are usually faster, more cost-effective, and culturally sensitive compared to formal judicial systems. This approach fosters a sense of community and encourages the amicable settlement of disputes.
Social Cohesion
Traditional institutions also play a vital role in promoting social cohesion. They organize and oversee communal activities, festivals, and rites of passage, which help to reinforce social bonds and cultural identity. By preserving cultural heritage and promoting communal values, traditional institutions contribute to the stability and harmony of society.
Governance and Administration
In many rural areas, traditional institutions are the primary form of governance. They manage land resources, oversee local development projects, and ensure the well-being of their communities. Their involvement in governance helps to bridge the gap between formal government structures and local populations, ensuring that policies and initiatives are relevant and effective at the grassroots level.
Challenges and Integration
Despite their significance, traditional institutions face several challenges. These include diminished authority due to political interference, lack of formal recognition, and inadequate resources. To maximize their potential, there is a need for greater integration of traditional institutions into the formal governance framework. This can be achieved through legal recognition, capacity building, and collaborative efforts between traditional and modern legal systems.
Traditional institutions in Nigeria are indispensable in promoting law and order, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. Their deep-rooted presence and understanding of local customs make them effective in conflict resolution, social cohesion, and governance. As Nigeria continues to develop, recognizing and integrating these institutions into the formal legal and governance structures will enhance their ability to contribute to a stable and orderly society.
by Legalnaija | Jan 16, 2025 | Blawg
Dear Valued Subscriber,
We hope this message finds you well!
We are excited to remind you that our incredible sales at the Legalnaija Bookstore are still ongoing! This is your golden opportunity to access a wealth of legal resources at unbeatable prices.
Whether you’re a legal professional, a student, or someone with a keen interest in the law, our bookstore offers a vast selection of books and digital resources that cater to your needs. From the latest legal textbooks to insightful commentaries and practical guides, there’s something for everyone.
Don’t miss out on these exclusive benefits:
– Significant Discounts: Enjoy substantial savings on a wide range of legal publications.
– Comprehensive Resources: Find everything from laws and regulations to case studies and legal analyses.
– Convenient Access: Shop from the comfort of your home and have your purchases delivered straight to your door or device.
This sale won’t last forever, so make sure to take full advantage of these fantastic offers before they end. Visit the Legalnaija Bookstore today and elevate your legal knowledge without breaking the bank!
Thank you for being a valued member of the Legalnaija community. We appreciate your continued support.
Best regards,
Legalnaija Team
by Legalnaija | Jan 9, 2025 | Blawg
Dear Colleagues,
Happy New Year and best wishes for 2025.
At the end of every year, most people reflect on their journey during the year, look at the good, the bad and the ugly and in most cases focus on what they could do better in the New Year.
On Christmas Day, a colleague posted a Christmas message from a Lagos-based Senior Advocate of Nigeria on a popular WhatsApp platform for lawyers that I belong to. The Secretary of one of the largest branches of the Nigerian Bar Association (“NBA” or “Association”) immediately jumped on the post stating that he heard that the SAN who was wishing colleagues a Merry Christmas plans to run for office of President of the NBA in 2026. This Secretary then went further to request that the SAN should donate to the digitisation of the Secretariat of his branch. On reading the post by this Secretary the story that I would use as fulcrum for my own reflections on the state of our dear profession became apparent.
In my view, in 2024 there were many worrisome reports and moments in the legal profession, including (i) the report by the National Bureau of Statistics that the Nigerian Judiciary was the most corrupt institution in the country; (ii) the Annual General Meeting of the NBA which ended without an approval of the audited accounts of the Association (for a second year in a row); (iii) the failure of the Electoral Committee of the NBA to abide by the provisions of its own Constitution regarding an audit of its elections; (iv) the shameful abdication of its duty to hear a challenge of the NBA elections by the Appeals Committee of the NBA, amongst others. Perhaps, the watershed is the ongoing imbroglio that concerns Chief Afe Babalola SAN and Mr, Dele Farotimi that has generated such furore locally and internationally. Whatever anyone says about the issue of Aare and Dele, the book in question and the entire episode stands out as a damning criticism of the Nigerian judicial system.
I would also mention that the most widely reported activity of our dear Association in the last year was a visit to Tompolo (a former Nigerian militant leader and ex-militant commander of the Movement for Emancipation of Niger Delta) during which our National Officers were seen showing off that they flew in private jets to the location. Interestingly, it speaks to the culture of impunity of the leaders and silence of the led that no one bothered to ask the purpose of the trip, the justification for it, how it was funded and so on.
As is the case with our Association, immediately after an NBA election and the swearing in of elected officers, the so called NBA politicians start announcing attendance at one event or the other at different branches, congratulating and felicitating everything including the hosting of meetings of branches, condoling with any and everyone and becoming emergency philanthropists willing to do literally anything in order to catch the attention of the voters.
To make matters worse, it has, very unfortunately, become the case that our Association now appears to have been captured by party politicians and government officials who fund elections of the NBA – forcing one to question what exactly their interest is in our Association or whether the NBA would ever be able to live by its own motto of promoting the rule of law. Plainly put, the NBA elections are now run in a way that NBA politicians seek support from governments in Nigeria for their elections and there is no way the NBA can effectively play its role as a watchdog if it continues to rely on those that it should check for its sustenance.
Whilst we struggle with the contradictions of identity and what our role in the wider context of society ought to be, I believe that, at the minimum, the very simple issues that pertain to the individual and collective advancement of the members of the profession should continue to agitate our minds. I am convinced that as part of our New Year resolution we must all individually and collectively work to make our profession, and our Association better and aggressively seek to restore its dignity. We should all commit not to keep quiet if things are going wrong or not to do our bit in public or private capacity – whichever end of the divide that we find ourselves. There are a number of issues that we must, in our enlightened self-interest, pay attention to. Some of them include:
- The Minimum Wage Question: About 4 years ago, the Tony Nwaochei led Remuneration Committee of the NBA carried out extensive research and consultations on the issue of the living wage for lawyers and also the scale of fees and charges. To my mind, these two issues still stand at the core of the issues that the NBA must tackle in order for it to truly play its representative role to its members. The prosperity of every hardworking lawyer must be at the core of the agenda for growth and development. We must seek ways of taking forward the extensive work that was done in this regard or tell ourselves that we are simply not prepared to face the issue head-on.
- Access to Finance: As President of the NBA, Olumide Akpata announced that his administration had set aside the sum of N1.5B (the equivalent of about US$3,500,000 at the time) and the National Executive Council of the NBA had passed a resolution that the funds should be used as foundation for setting up the Access to Finance Scheme which would allow lawyers to borrow up to specified sums from either First Bank of Nigeria Limited or Access Bank PLC, at a hugely discounted single digit rate of 9%. One wonders why nothing has been heard of the funds and the scheme in the last two and a half years and counting.
- Court Monitoring Scheme: There was also a Court Monitoring Scheme that the NBA had invested N18,000,000 in developing an App to facilitate. This scheme was structured to provide real time statistics on the performance of our courts and help the NBA in engaging more constructively in conversations on the Justice Sector. The scheme already had the buy-in of the judiciary and there is no reason why it should be abandoned. In spite of the importance of this scheme in improving the efficiency of our courts, nothing has been heard or said about it since September 2022.
- Protection of Lawyers Work: How much of the work that should come to Nigerian lawyers are given to foreign lawyers by Nigerian Government and its agencies that are involved in large transactions and disputes? What are we doing to ensure that these things don’t happen and that the provisions of the Legal Practitioners Act and other laws that seek to protect the turf of Nigerian lawyers are followed to the letter? We must do everything to ensure that we check the excesses of government and others who send work that should come to Nigerian lawyers elsewhere.
The list goes on and on. It is my view that, as stakeholders in our profession, we owe ourselves a duty to participate in its affairs and to push for the reforms that would transform our profession for the better.
As I close, let me return to the fellow that was openly asking for financial assistance (from a perceived aspirant) for the digitisation of his branch. The constant demand by the branches of the NBA for financial support from non-members of the branch is, perhaps, one of the most despicable and corrupt part of our politics at the NBA and may end up destroying the polity. Turning those that seek to lead you into emergency philanthropists or blackmailing them for votes can only further diminish the branches and indeed the Association. Branches and indeed the NBA must learn to cut their respective clothes to their cloth. There is absolutely no point in embarking on projects that we cannot fund ourselves.
I hope that this year is a year that we identify our purpose and pursue the same vigorously.
Tobenna Erojikwe
Former Chairman Governing Board of
NBA Institute of Continuing Legal Education
by Legalnaija | Jan 9, 2025 | Blawg
Registration opens for PrivCon 2025: The Premier Privacy Conference to Address Cybersecurity and Privacy in Nigeria
The third edition of PrivCon, Nigeria’s leading annual privacy conference, is set to take place on 26th February 2025 at The Civic Centre, Victoria Island, Lagos. This year’s conference promises to be an insightful gathering for stakeholders in privacy, data protection, cybersecurity, and related sectors as it tackles the theme: “Cybersecurity and Privacy in Nigeria: Connecting the Dots.”
PrivCon has steadily grown into a crucial event for industry leaders, government officials, legal experts, business executives, and technology professionals to come together, share knowledge, and discuss emerging issues surrounding privacy and data protection in Nigeria. With data security and privacy taking center stage in today’s digital landscape, this year’s edition will delve into the critical relationship between cybersecurity and privacy, offering fresh perspectives on how these two domains intersect and how they can be better integrated to safeguard Nigerians’ data in an increasingly connected world.
The keynote address will be delivered by Prof. Peter Adewale Obadare, Nigeria’s foremost cybersecurity expert and the country’s first-ever Professor of Practice for Security. Prof. Obadare, known for his pioneering work in the field of cybersecurity, will provide attendees with vital insights into the pressing issues affecting cybersecurity in Nigeria and its direct impact on privacy rights and data protection frameworks.
Attendance at PrivCon 2025 is free, but pre-registration is required. Interested attendees are encouraged to register early to secure their spots. To register, please visit the official conference website at www.privconnigeria.org.
PrivCon 2025 is set to attract a diverse group of professionals from across the privacy, legal, technology, and security sectors, providing a unique platform for collaboration, networking, and exchanging ideas on the future of privacy and data protection in Nigeria.
For more information on PrivCon 2025 or to register for the conference, visit www.privconnigeria.org.
by Legalnaija | Jan 5, 2025 | Uncategorized
International Law Association (ILA) kicks off registration for its 8th Annual Conference: Early bird registration ends on January 30
To examine the role of international law in boosting regional trade and investment integration as a tool for sustainable development, the Nigerian branch of the International Law Association (ILA Nigeria) will hold its annual conference from April 09-10, 2025.
In a statement by the organizers, this year’s conference, which will hold at Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, will provide a platform for international lawyers to explore the dynamic role of international law in fostering trade and investment that leads to sustainable and inclusive growth. As globalization deepens, the importance of international legal frameworks in guiding and fostering international trade and investment becomes paramount. One of the largest and most anticipated annual legal events, this conference will gather legal scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and business leaders to discuss, debate, and propose forward-looking legal solutions that can contribute to a sustainable global economy.
Confirmed speakers for the conference include H.E Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, GCFR, Former President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria; H.E Omar Alieu Touray, President of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Commission, H.E Professor Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu, Former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources of Nigeria and former President of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC); and Professor Damilola Olawuyi, SAN, President of ILA Nigeria and United Nations independent expert on the working group on business and human rights; Mohammed Mijindadi, President and CEO of General Electric (GE) Nigeria and Managing Director of GE Gas Power Systems (GPS) for Nigeria and Anglo-West Africa; Wola Joseph-Condotti, Group Managing Director/CEO, West Power & Gas Limited, amongst other notable experts.
According to the conference registration schedule, early bird discount is expected to end on January 30, 2025.
The ILA was founded in Brussels in 1873. The ILA now has some 4,500 members in 45 national and regional branches around the world. It is headquartered in London under the leadership of the global chair, Professor Christine Chinkin. The Nigerian Branch of the ILA regularly hosts innovative lectures, seminars, conferences, and other capacity development programs to advance the study and understanding of international law in Nigeria. To learn more about the ILA, its activities, and events visit http://www.ilanigeria.org.ng
by Legalnaija | Dec 22, 2024 | Blawg
The caption of this article was inspired by a 2013 movie (12 years a slave) where an African man who was kidnapped and sold into slavery in the US constantly struggled to regain freedom for 12 years. While enacting most Nigerian laws, we continue in our somewhat ‘slavish’ adherence to some English tenets which are incompatible with our culture and in some cases, we appear indifferent about gaining legislative freedom from some of our inherited or received English legal principles.
This article focuses on how a certain provisions of the ‘inherited’ and unrevised succession law in Lagos State interferes with the constitutional right to private and family life. I have not checked the Wills Laws of other States to confirm whether they have similar provisions, but section 11 of the Wills Law of Lagos State intriguingly provides that: “Every will made by a man or a woman shall be revoked by his or her marriage (other than a marriage in accordance with Customary Law) except…”
This provision was imported or inherited from the English Wills Act 1837 – a period of 186 years ago. For the avoidance of doubt, section 18 of the Act provides that: “Every will made by a man or woman shall be revoked by his or her marriage…”
For proper context this, this provision was enacted as a shield to protect women from the medieval English culture that automatically converted women’s properties into their husbands’ upon marriage. Dr Juliet Brook, an associate professor at the University of Reading, elaborately captures the historical reasoning behind the rule thus:
“At the time of the enactment of the Wills Act 1837, the status of a woman changed fundamentally on marriage. She became a feme covert, with her property becoming that of her husband. Following her marriage, she could only make a will of personality if her husband consented to its terms, and any will of land made by a feme covert was void by statute. Due to the much-reduced property ownership
rights that came with the status of being a feme covert, it was not possible for a will made prior to her marriage to continue as a valid will after the marriage and a woman’s will was therefore revoked on marriage.” (See Brook, J. Automatic revocation of a will on marriage – a rule that is past its use-by date? Private Client Business, 2024 (1). pp. 20-27).
Happily, the United Kingdom is currently engaging stakeholders on the necessity to review the oppressive provision that has now become a tool of predatory marriages. (see Law commission considers wills and predatory marriage – does the law need to change? <https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8df64189-bc08-4b30-8dbb-350dfae768fd)
The privacy problem with section 11 of Wills Law of Lagos State
Making a will is a personal affair covered by the right to private and family life under section 37 of the Nigerian Constitution. The Court of Appeal has elaborately interpreted section 37 of the Constitution in Nwali v EBSIEC (2014) LPELR-23682(CA) to cover a person’s plans, choices, desires, relationships, material possessions and family life. Hence, the plan or desire to choose whoever to bequeath one’s personal properties to, upon one’s death is a personal affair covered by the right to privacy.
Privacy being a constitutional right, towers above the Wills Law enacted by the Lagos House of Assembly which tends to interfere with the enjoyment of freedom to dispose one’s properties just because the person marries under the Act. In my opinion, the provision of section 11 interferes with the right to plan one’s succession by assigning personal properties to beneficiaries of one’s choices upon
The right to private and family life inherently protects an individual’s autonomy over their personal affairs, choices and decisions. These decisions including plans relating to property, inheritance, and the disposition of one’s estate after death.
Hence, a provision that allows the automatic revocation of Will by marriage undermines the testator’s autonomy. It essentially dislodges an individual’s desire to control the distribution of their estate as they please.
The making of a Wills is usually informed by many reasons, one of which may be the desire to keep family members’ closely-knit by designating certain properties as family properties. Consequently, the automatic revocation provided under section 11 will force testators to rewrite their Wills upon marriage, which may not necessarily reflect their uninfluenced intentions. This is particularly instructive where someone contracts a marriage in circumstances where they do not intend to alter the provisions of their existing Will. The revocation provision forces a change to this personal and private prearrangement without the individual’s active decision, thereby violating their right to manage their personal affairs according to their wishes. The provision represents an unnecessary and for the most part, an unjustifiable intrusion by the state into a private matter, as it essentially dictates that an individual’s personal decisions regarding the distribution of assets must be modified by a life event (marriage) even if the individual does not wish to do so. This reduces the individual’s ability to make decisions about their estate in line with their desires and preferences.
Conclusion
The provision of section 11 that automatically revokes a Will upon marriage constitutes an unpalatable disruption of an individual’s right to private and family life. By undermining the autonomy of individuals in managing the distribution of their estates, this provision disregards personal wishes and the right to make decisions regarding one’s property without undue interference from the state through legislation. The automatic revocation forces individuals to modify their estate plans, even when they may not intend to do so, disrupting carefully considered arrangements made prior to marriage. This is the case for learned testators but in the case of the undiscerning, the consequences are worse upon their demise.
While the intent behind this provision may be to protect the interests of spouses and ensure equitable distribution of assets, it fails to account for the diversity of family structures and the nuanced personal nature of estate planning. By imposing a blanket rule on subsequent (statutory) marriages, it undermines the principle of personal autonomy – an essential interest protection by the constitutional right to privacy. Ultimately, the automatic revocation of a Will by marriage is a measure that requires careful re-examination to balance the legitimate interests of protecting spouses with the fundamental right to control one’s personal and familial affairs. Legal frameworks should aim to uphold the integrity of individuals’ decisions while also providing mechanisms for fair and equitable treatment of spouses, ensuring that the principles of private and family life remain respected and protected.
by Legalnaija | Dec 11, 2024 | Blawg
The court’s power (or lack thereof) to compel an adult to submit to DNA test: A tale of two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions on the privacy implications | Olumide Babalola
On Sunday, the 1st day of December 2024, while watching Manchester United’s demolition of Everton FC when Mr Folabi Kuti, SAN graciously sent me copy of judgment of Supreme Court of India in Firodia v Firodia SLP (C) No.9855/2022 where the court held that resort to DNA test ought not be exclusively used to prove adultery in divorce cases. In that case, the court interestingly held that the mother of a child could, in deserving circumstances, oppose the conduct of DNA test on her child.
In Nigeria, while the case law is somewhat settled on the powers of the court to order DNA tests to prove paternity on the application of the parties, the law is still shaky on the privacy implications of such order especially where a parent objects. In the last decade, the Nigerian Court of Appeal has delivered two contradictory decisions concerning the issue of whether an adult can be compelled to undergo a DNA test. The rulings, while addressing similar issues, have brought into sharp focus the balance between an individual’s right to privacy and the state’s interest in compelling a person to submit to genetic testing.
In Tony Anozia v Mrs Patricia Nnani (2015) LPELR – 24277(CA), a man who was never married to a woman sued her and her 57-year-old son seeking declaration that the applicant was the biological father of the grown-up. The applicant consequently sought an order referring the woman and her son for DNA test upon which the court would make a declaration of paternity. Interestingly the Applicant also sought an order issuing bench warrant against the 57-year-old and his mother to participate in the suit. In the case, the High refused to order the mother to present herself for DNA test because, according to the Court of Appeal, the courts lack such powers. For full measure, the Court of Appeal, per Mbaba, JCA elaborately held that:
“By insisting that the interlocutory application ought to have been granted, and implying that DNA test was indispensable in the circumstances, as oral evidence would never be conclusive to determine paternity of the 2nd Defendant, Appellant was admitting he had no evidence to establish his claim and so needed the Court to assist him extract a possible evidence from the Defendants, by ordering them to submit to DNA test to case was founded on speculation and assumption that if the DNA test was ordered, the result was likely to favour him – Appellant! Certainly, Appellant cannot be allowed such whimsical past time, as it has no place in law. It is unimaginable for a court to order two unwilling adults or senior citizens to
submit to DNA test, in defiance of their fundamental rights to privacy for the purpose of extracting scientific evidence to assist Appellant to confirm or disprove his wish that the 2nd Defendant -a 57 year old man -is his child, of an illicit amorous relationship!…I think it is only the 2nd Respondent (a mature adult) that can waive his rights and/or seek to compel his parents (or those laying claim to him) to submit to DNA test to prove his root. Of course, where one is a minor (not mature adult) and his paternity is in issue, the Court can order the conduct of DNA test, in the overall interest of the child, to ascertain where he belongs. That is not the situation in this case, where Appellant has a duty to establish his claim on the 2nd Respondent, independently, and to produce such evidence to the Court. Of course, if he elects to use the DNA test, to establish his claim it is up to the Appellant to go for it on his own, and/or woo the Respondents to do so, without a resort to the coercive powers of the Court, to compel his adversary to supply him with the possible evidence he needs to prove his case.”
In his concurring judgment, Raphael Agbo, JCA (of blessed memory) held that:
“In this appeal the Appellant is challenging the refusal of the trial Court in an interlocutory application to order the 2nd Respondent to subject himself to a medical
procedure which he calls DNA test to enable the Appellant to prove that the 2nd Respondent is an illegitimate child. The Respondents have no duty to help the
Appellant to establish his case. That remains squarely his responsibility. The Appellant was asking the trial Court to encroach on the privacy of a citizen, a right
entrenched by Section 34 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The prayer is scandalous in the extreme and must be deprecated. The trial judge was right in refusing the application.”
In a later case of Peace Izontimi v Steven Izontimi (2017) LPELR-45004 (CA), a man filed for divorce wherein he denied fathering the children of the marriage. Before the matter got to trial, the man filed an application for the court to compel his wife and the infant children to submit themselves to DNA test. When the trial court granted the application, the woman appealed to the Court of Appeal where she formulated as issue on “Whether considering the circumstances it was proper for the court to order for DNA test against the Appellant’s will?”
On the appeal, the appellant’s counsel argued that an order compelling an adult to submit to DNA test violates the right to privacy under section 37 of the Constitution and also referred the court to its earlier stance in Anozia’s case, but the court went ahead to resolve the issue from an evidential point of view to the exclusion of privacy discussion thus:
“I am still of the firm but humble view that maternity or paternity of any children in a marriage cannot be determined by the mere ipse dixit of the disputants but
by evidence … I have considered and taken into account the place of DNA tests in bringing about evidential facts by way of expert and scientific evidence and its relevance in the circumstances of the instant appeal. Even though, the discretion to grant or refuse the application of the Petitioner/Respondent to order for DNA tests, is primarily that of the lower court to exercise… The ruling of the Bayelsa State High Court delivered on 18th December, 2015 in Suit No. BHC/ID/2015 is affirmed.”
Here, the court curiously alluded to the court’s power to compel a child’s mother to submit to DNA test as a matter for judicial discretion even where the mother opposes such a test. The Court of Appeal’s approaches in these two cases are at loggerheads. While in Anozia, the court clearly ruled that an adult cannot be compelled by the court to submit to DNA test, in Izontimi a later case, the court affirmed a High court’s order compelling a mother to submit to DNA test.
Since the Court of Appeal avoided the issue of privacy in Izontimi, the conclusion in Anozia’s case which acknowledged the violation of the right to privacy is preferable as it reinforces the Supreme Court’s decision in Okonkwo v MDPDT v Okonkwo (2001) 7 NWLR (Pt. 711) 206 where the apex court defines privacy to mean: “right to protect one’s thought, conscience or religious belief and practice from coercive and unjustified intrusion; and, one’s body from unauthorised invasion. …The sum total of the rights of privacy and of freedom of thought, conscience or religion which an individual has, put in a nutshell, is that an individual should be left alone to choose a course for his life, unless a clear and compelling overriding state interest justifies the contrary.” (Emphasis mine)
In this context, forcing an adult to submit to a DNA test constitutes an infringement on their personal autonomy, bodily integrity, and privacy. Admittedly, the state may have a legitimate interest in determining paternity or resolving inheritance issues, such matters should not override an individual’s right to bodily autonomy, especially where no immediate or overriding public interest is at stake. Forcing an adult to submit to a DNA test was likened to subjecting someone to unwanted medical procedures, which is a breach of privacy rights.
In the second case, where the Court of Appeal was silent on the potential violation of the right to privacy, the outcome raises important questions. The failure to address the privacy concerns leaves the legal landscape unclear and creates a precedent that could potentially undermine privacy rights in similar cases. While it is possible that the Court intended to focus on the essentiality of DNA tests and necessity of evidence of paternity, its failure to deal with the constitutional issue of privacy could lead to confusion in future cases. Without a clear stance on privacy, the legal system may struggle to navigate the tension between the state’s interest in solving certain legal questions (e.g., determining paternity or inheritance rights) and the individual’s constitutional right to privacy. Moreover, the absence of a detailed examination of privacy rights leaves room for future cases to potentially erode the protections afforded to individuals in relation to their bodily autonomy.
Conclusion
The conflicting decisions from the Nigerian Court of Appeal on whether an adult can be compelled to submit to a DNA test underscore the ongoing debate over the right to privacy and individual autonomy in an age of advanced forensic technology. While one decision clearly protects the right to privacy, the other leaves the issue unaddressed, highlighting the need for greater clarity in both judicial reasoning around privacy and DNA tests. As genetic testing becomes more prevalent in legal and societal matters in Nigeria, the courts must strive to always balance the complex intersection of burden of proof and the right to privacy. Through judicial decisions, it is essential that privacy rights are preserved while ensuring that the law can effectively address the growing role of DNA testing in contemporary legal disputes.