DID YOU KNOW: – PENALTY FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING

DID YOU KNOW: – PENALTY FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING


Do you
know that all forms of human trafficking in Nigeria are prohibited?

Any
person who recruits, transports, transfers, harbours or receives another person
by means of –
a.    
Threat or use of
force or other forms of coercion.
b. Abduction, fraud,
deception, abuse of power or position of  vulnerability;
c.     
Giving or receiving
of payments or benefits to achieve the consent or control of a person having
control over another person, for the purpose of exploiting that person;
Commits an
offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment of not less than 2 years
and a fine of not less than N250,000.
 Section 13, Trafficking In Person (Prohinbition) Enforcement And
Administration Act 2015.
 


CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR SPREADING AIDS

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR SPREADING AIDS

Photo Credits- www.nakedlaw.avvo.com

As we look back to the
celebration of the World’s AIDS day on 1/12/2015 and as we sympathize with
Charlie Sheen who recently disclosed his HIV status, there is an issue which I
believe must be very instructional to us. 
What happens if a person
who is infected with HIV has unprotected sexual intercourse with another
without disclosing his/her status. Should this act be considered as a crime? 

In 2014, there were over
three million people living with HIV in Nigeria according UNAIDS and regarding
the aggressive nature of the virus and lack of a downright cure, not to mention
the mental and emotional stress that comes from being diagnosed with HIV, I
believe it must be classified as a crime to intentionally inflict another with
such turmoil, especially if same could have been prevented. Isn’t it time we
had legislation to prohibit this?
In the United State, Charlie
Sheen, the famous Hollywood actor may be prosecuted in court for the act of
“willful exposure” because he may have had unprotected sexual relations without
informing them of his status. The law in California is clear that anyone with a
communicable disease who willfully exposes another is guilty. Basically, it is
a crime for someone to have unprotected sex when that person knows he or she is
infected with HIV without informing the other sex partner. 
This leads to the
question, how many people are going about willfully spreading communicable diseases
in Nigeria especially HIV? And what is the government framework in place to
prohibit or punish such an act? 
I will suggest that the
Nigerian Senate and respective House of Assemblies prepare a code on Health and
Safety which will provide to prohibit such willful acts of exposure to HIV and
other communicable diseases the transmission of which is a threat to public
health and safety. 
For instance, by virtue of
the California Health and Safety Code 120290: Willful Exposure to Infectious
Diseases, it is a misdemeanor for you to willfully expose yourself to another
person if you are afflicted with a disease that is contagious, infectious or
communicable, or to willfully expose another person who is afflicted with a
disease to another person. The crime does not require that you intended to
infect another person. All that is required is that you willfully engage in
activity that you knew or reasonably should have known there was a risk that
you could spread the disease to the alleged victim. 
I believe Nigeria is in
need of such a provision in our law and same must be passed as soon as
possible.  If you believe same, why not
put a proposal through to your representative at the State and Federal levels. 
Adedunmade
Onibokun
@adedunmade

POLICE ACTING AS DEBT RECOVERY AGENTS

POLICE ACTING AS DEBT RECOVERY AGENTS

Photo credits – www.informationng.com
Have you noticed that the
Police are our default go –to – persons whenever we have anyone of the myriad
of issues we deal with on a daily basis. One act which I find most absurd is
when we make them our debt collectors, this means the police in a way serve as
contract enforcers, which I believe is not right.  A friend once recounted his experience with
the police to me and explained how he had entered into a contract which did not
work out so well, thus finding himself liable to his partner to the tune of a
few millions.

The creditor had become
inpatient and reported my friend to the police, who in turn arrested my friend
at his place of business but released him on bail. Though my friend has long paid his debt, I remember
wondering if the police also had a duty to act as debt collectors or contract
enforcers for the general public.
A look at section 4 of the
Police Act spells out the duty of the police. It states that:-
“The Police shall be employed for
the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the
preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and the due
enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged,
and shall perform such military duties within or outside Nigeria as may be
required of them by, or under the authority of this or any other Act”.
From the foregoing, I do
not see the words debt collector stated in the Police Act, do you? So why do
Nigerians call the police for such. I will rather recommend you call a debt
recovery agent.
The courts also frown on
the practice of using the Police as debt collectors. This is illustrated in the
case of A.C (O.A.O) Nig Ltd V. Umanah
(2013) 4 NWLR (Pt 1344) Page 323
where the Court of Appeal held that:
The
statutory duties of the police under the Police Act is to maintain peace, law
and order in the society. Debt collection or loan recovery is not within the
purview of the statutory duties and powers of the police”.
In conclusion, I will
suggest that the police focus on its primary duties rather than allow
distractions from matters such as debts or loan recovery. Moreover, Nigerians
have to understand that a lawyer is someone you must have on speed dial all the
time before you enter into contractual agreements.
Adedunmade
Onibokun
@adedunmade

LEGAL AGE FOR SEX IN NIGERIA

LEGAL AGE FOR SEX IN NIGERIA


Credits-thegirlsshowng.blogspot.com

For the purposes of determining the legal age of
sexual consent, we shall be relying on the provisions of the Child Rights Act
(2003). However, we must understand that the
in 2003,
Nigeria adopted the Child Rights Act to domesticate the Convention on the
Rights of the Child. Although this law was passed at the Federal level, it is
only effective if State Assemblies also enact it. To date, only about 16 of the
country’s 36 States have passed the Act.  The Act aims to promote and protect the rights
of children and it is quite important that other states in Nigeria yet to adopt
same do so in the interest of the children of that state.
With regard to sexual intercourse
with children, the Act provides in Section 31, that-

  
(1) No person, shall have sexual intercourse with a
child.
(2) A person who contravenes the provision of
Subsection (1) of this section commits an offence of rape and is liable on
conviction to imprisonment for life.
(3) Where a person is charged with an offence under
this section, it is immaterial that—
(a) the offender believed the person to be of or above
the age of eighteen years ; or
(b) the sexual intercourse was with the consent of the
child.
The above provisions simply mean that sexual
intercourse between an adult and a minor is prohibited and such adult cannot
claim that he/she believed the minor to be 18 or the intercourse was with the consent
of the child.
Other forms of sexual abuse and exploitation provided
for in the Child Rights Act can be found in Section 32 which provides that –
(1) A person who sexually abuses or sexually exploits
a child in any manner not already mentioned under the Act commits an offence.
(2) A person who commits an offence under Subsection
(1) of this section is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of
fourteen years.
The above provisions of the Act anticipate situations
of sexual exploitation against minors which may have not been provided for in
the Act and states that such acts will find the offender liable to 14yrs
imprisonment.  
Adedunmade
Onibokun Esq.
@adedunmade
HOW SELF DEFENSE WORKS

HOW SELF DEFENSE WORKS


 

credits-www.tes.com

What will you do if
an angry colleague with whom you had a heated argument earlier in the day is
running towards you with a knife, obviously with the intention of doing you
harm? I am guessing if you do not have a way of protecting yourself, you had
probably run away but what if you had a gun, would you shoot your assailant?
And if you did shoot him, will self – defense avail you in court?
Let’s begin by
delving into what the self –defense as a defense stands for?

Self- defense
according to Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Edition, is the use of
force to protect oneself, one’s family, or one’s property from real or
threatened attack. The principle states that a person is justified in using a
reasonable amount of force in self – defense if he or she reasonably believes
that the danger of bodily harm is imminent and that force is necessary to avoid
this danger.
Section 286 of the
Criminal Code Act states it as follows: –
“when
a person is unlawfully assaulted, and has not provoked the assault, it is
lawful for him to use such force to the assailant as is reasonably necessary to
make effectual defense against the assault:
Provided
that the force used is not intended, and is not such as is likely, to cause
death or grievous harm.
If the
nature of the assault is such as to cause reasonable apprehension of death or
grievous harm, and the person using force by way of defense believes, on
reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve the person defended from
death or grievous harm, it is lawful for him to use any such force to the assailant
as is necessary for defense, even though such force may cause death or grievous
harm”.
An illustration is
the case of Nnamani V State (2005) 9 NWLR (Pt. 929) 147, where the accused
was charged with murder. The case of the prosecution was that the accused
person stabbed the deceased with a knife which led to the death of the latter.
The accused pleaded self – defense, stating that the deceased had tried to stab
him with a broken bottle, however, it was discovered that the deceased had
already dropped the broken  bottle long
before the accused stabbed him and it was held that self – defense could not
avail the accused.
The general rule is
the force you use to protect yourself must be equal to the degree of imminent
threat. Therefore, stabbing a person who wants to slap you is not self –
defense or shooting a person who wants to punch you except you can prove that
the punch would have killed you. 
Adedunmade Onibokun, Esq
@adedunmade

ROBBING AN ATM

ROBBING AN ATM

Photo credits – www.atm-link.com

I
remember a scene from the movie Fast and Furious 6 where Ludacris, a member of
Dominick Torredo’s team, manipulated an ATM (Automated Teller Machine) and
money began spewing from it, you can imagine how people on the streets must have
rushed to pick up the notes as they spilled out. So after hearing about a
failed ATM burglary in the news someday, my friends and I debated how easy or
difficult it must be to burgle one, a look at the metal machine seems to
somehow say I am not giving up any money except you type in a password. Sadly,
the reported thief in the news could not get any money out of the machine but
ended up in a jail cell. 
Trying
to break into or manipulate an ATM is a serious crime with serious consequences
in Nigeria as espoused in the Cyber Crimes (prohibition, Prevention) Act, 2015.
The law in Section 30 states that:

“Any person who
manipulates an ATM machine or Point of Sales terminal with the intention to
defraud shall be guilty of an offence and upon conviction sentenced to five (5)
years imprisonment or N5,000,000 (Five
Million Naira) fine or both”
.
I
guess now you must see my point about why it is a serious crime. Due to the
fact that most ATM machines are located within banks or fitted by banks, it is
not unusual to hear that staffs of a bank are involved in certain fraudulent
acts with others to defraud the bank. That’s why sub-section 2 of section 30
stated above further provides that; 
“Any
employee of a financial institution found to have connived with another person
or group of persons to perpetrate fraud using an ATM or point of sale device,
shall be guilty of an offence and upon conviction sentenced to seven years
imprisonment without an option of fine”. 
In
a nutshell, if you have been intending to burgle an ATM machine you should
probably think twice except you believe 5 years in a Nigerian prison is an
experience you will like to partake in. 
Adedunmade Onibokun, Esq
@adedunmade

Is Presumptive Tax the answer to Tax Evasion in Nigeria? by Sogo Akinola

Is Presumptive Tax the answer to Tax Evasion in Nigeria? by Sogo Akinola

Credits – Nigerianbestforum.com

Tax avoidance and evasion
have become the culture of some individuals and businesses operating in
Nigeria.One of the latest indexes, “Paying Taxes 2015”, which compares tax
systems across the world, ranked Nigeria the 3rd worst globally in
tax compliance. The assessment is based on three major indicators; total tax
rate, number of payments and compliance time.
The survey reveals that it
takes the Nigerian taxpayer an average of 908 hours to comply, followed by
Bolivia about 1,025 hours, and the worst being Brazil- about 2,600 hours. Out
of the 189 economies, Nigeria –Africa’s largest economy by GDP size, ranks low
at 179 with total tax rate at 32.7 percent.

With the decline of oil
revenues and the uproar for alternative sources of revenue and poor global
ranking of Nigeria’s tax compliance, The Federal Inland Revenue Service
(“FIRS”) must embrace the Presumptive Income Tax Assessment (“PITA”) into the
Nigerian tax system.
What is the Presumptive
Income Tax Assessment?
Presumptive tax can be
traced to Milan, as early as the 17th century when the value of land was used
to estimate tax instead of the actual production from that land. This
stimulated increased production on the land because taxpayers wanted to
maximise production so as to beat the system.
Presumptive income
taxation is primarily used in economies where ‘hard-to-tax’ taxpayers comprise
the majority of the population and administrative resources are scarce. In
these societies, most taxpayers lack integrity or financial transparency that
allows for effective taxation by the relevant tax authority. The result is that
governments estimate or presume the appropriate income on which taxes should be
levied.
In Ehtisham Ahmad&
Nicholas Stern‘s “The theory & practice of Tax reforms in developing
countries” 276 (1991) defines Presumption Tax system as the use of indirect
means to ascertain tax liability which differs from the usual rules based on
the taxpayers account.
The tax payer captured
under this regime are the ones who are hard to assess because they earn low
incomes; they sell their goods and offer services largely for cash which makes
it impossible to apply withholding tax; they are compelled by non-tax reasons
to keep books of accounts and their number is too great which renders it
impossible to intensively scrutinize a reasonable fraction of them, they could
be mostly classified in the informal sector. This makes it easy for such a
tax-payer to conceal their incomes.
Presumptive tax system
must conform with the five major canons of a good tax system. These include;
certainty, Economy, convenience, fairness/equity and simplicity.
Many scholars try to
derive the legality of presumptive tax system from the provisions of Section 65
of the Companies Income Tax Act which empowers the Tax Authority to use the
best of its judgment to assess a company but there is no expressly stated
provisions for the system in any tax regulation or Act in Nigeria.
What do we stand to gain?
·       
It simplifies tax administration and
improves compliance by small scale taxpayers.
·       
It minimises tax evasion and avoidance.
·       
It improves tax assessment.
·       
It minimises the adverse effects of
progressive taxation.
Likely challenges?
·       
Potential Taxpayers  might not be willing to pay presumptive tax
because they think they pay many more other taxes and levies such as toll gate
fees, and other.
·    Potential taxpayers “associations” need to
be involved in the process of coming up with tax levels for purpose than if the
tax rates are imposed on them.
·   
The usual taxpayers may result to
presumptive tax because the costs of maintaining proper books of accounts from
which to base normal income tax would be very high and so presumptive taxation
is a cheaper option.
CONCLUSION

Presumptive taxation is undoubtedly a way of curbing
widespread tax avoidance without employing excessive government resources
because it addresses the concerns of both the taxpayer and the tax authority.
The chances of the system working in Nigeria depends on how the relevant tax
authorities apply it.
XENOPHOBIC LAWS IN NIGERIA

XENOPHOBIC LAWS IN NIGERIA


Credits – dailymaverick.co.za

 South
Africa was in the spot light a few months ago after the Zulu king, Goodwill
Zwelithini, was reported to have said that foreigners “should pack their
bags and go back home”. The king later denied making those comments but
within days the violence had spread to the country’s most populous city Johannesburg.
The comment led to the harassment, assault and in some extreme cases the death
of persons who were immigrants in South Africa. These violent act was
criticized the world over and thankfully the South-African authorities were
able to get things under control, though a lot of damage had already been done.
Xenophobia
can be described as the fear of strangers or foreigners. In Nigeria, there have
been tensions between various ethnic groups in the past, some resulting in
violence. Nigeria’s online community is very active and can cause an issue or
comment to trend in a very short time, thus imagine a situation where a
xenophobic comment is shared and allowed to trend, this could pose a major
problem for everyone. That’s why our laws prohibit xenophobic or racist
comments even on online media.

  

Credits – cnn.com
The
Cybercrime (prohibition, prevention,etc) Act 2015 in Section 26 provides that any
person who with intent distributes any racist or xenophobic material to the
public through a computer system or network or insults or threatens persons for
the reason that they belong to a group distinguished by race, colour, descent,
national or ethnic origin, as well as, religion or who distributes material
which denies or approves or justifies acts constituting genocide or crimes
against humanity shall be liable on conviction to 5 years in prison or to a
fine not less than N10,000,000 (Ten Million Naira) or both”.
For
the sake of interpreting the law and trying to figure what can constitute a genocides
or xenophobic material, genocide means acts committed with intent to destroy in
whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. Racist or
xenophobic material on the other hand means any written or printed material or
any image which advocates, promotes or incites hatred, discrimination or
violence against any group or individuals. 
It
is quite important that while tweeting and sharing on the web, we should be
careful not to make any inciting, racist or xenophobic statements. Not to also ignore the criminal liability that comes with assaulting another person or inciting others to commit assault.

Adedunmade
Onibokun, Esq
@adedunmade
THE VIOLENCE AGAINST PERSONS ACT 2015 (PART 1)

THE VIOLENCE AGAINST PERSONS ACT 2015 (PART 1)

Credits – Google
The
Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act 2015 recently signed into law is an
act to eliminate violence in private and public life, prohibit all forms of
violence against persons and to provide maximum protection and effective
remedies for victims and punishment of offenders in Abuja.

The
law begins in Section 1 by defining rape as the intentional penetration of the
vagina, anus or mouth of another person if such person does not consent to the
said penetration or if the consent is obtained by force or means of threat or
intimidation. It also recognises that women can commit rape as well.  Section 2 states that a person if found
guilty of rape will be liable to imprisonment for life except where the
offender is less than 14 years in which such person will be liable to a maximum
of 12 years in prison, however, in other cases such person can only be
sentenced to a minimum of 12 years in prison. If the rape is however committed
by a group of persons, the offenders are liable jointly to a maximum of 20
years imprisonment without option of fine and the court shall also award
compensation to the victim. The law also states that a register of convicted
sex offenders shall be maintained and accessible to the public.

The
new law also provides that anyone who wilfully causes or inflicts physical
injury on another commits an  offence and
is liable on conviction to a jail term not exceeding 5 years in prison or a
fine not exceeding N100, 000 or both.

Also
anyone who incites, aids, abets or counsels another person to commit an act of
violence is liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 3
years or a fine not exceeding N200, 000 or both. The court may also
award compensation to the victim.

Furthermore,
according to the law, coercing another to engage in acts that are detrimental
to the person’s physical or psychological well being is an offence and a person
is liable on conviction to imprisonment for 3 years.  Anyone who also wilfully places a person in
fear of physical injury commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term
of imprisonment not exceeding 1 year to a fine not exceeding of N100,
000.

Compelling
another to commit an act either sexual or otherwise, to the detriment of the
victim’s physical or psychological well being is an offence and a guilty party
is liable on conviction to a jail term not exceeding 2years.

Credits – Google
It
is worthy to note that the law prohibits female circumcision and offenders will
be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 4 years or to a fine not
exceeding N200, 000 or both. An attempt to commit the act also attracts
a jail term not exceeding 2 years and a fine not exceeding N100,000 or
both.

The
law also provides for forceful ejection from the home wherein a person who
forcefully evicts a spouse or refuses them access commits an offence and liable
to a jail term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding N300,000 or
both. The law also states that depriving another of his or her liberty without
a court order is an offence and a person convicted is liable to a jail term not
exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding N500, 000.

Causing
mischief or destruction of property with intent to case distress is also an
offence and a guilty party will be liable to jail term not exceeding two years
in prison or a fine not exceeding N300, 000.

Credits – Google
Another
offence is also forcefully isolating a person from friends and family and a
guilty person on conviction will be liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding N100, 000 or both.

Furthermore,
a person who causes emotional, verbal and psycholoical abuse on another also
commits an offence and is liable on conviction to jail time not exceeding 3
months or a fine not exceeding N100, 000 or both. Subjecting a widow to
harmful traditional practices is also an offence under the Act and offenders
will be liable to jail term not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding N500,
000 or both.

Kindly
look forward to further write ups on the Legalnaija blog where I will be
sharing the other provisions contained in the Violence Against Persons Act
2015. 

 Adedunmade
Onibokun, Esq

@adedunmade

PENALTY FOR IMPROPER USE OF VOTER’S CARDS

PENALTY FOR IMPROPER USE OF VOTER’S CARDS

Editor’s note: This is the second post in a series informing
the public on Electoral offences, you can find the first post here – Punishment
for buying and selling voter’s cards
The recent Presidential primaries of the APC and PDP caused
some excitement over the last couple of days. Elections are coming closer by
the day and political parties are ensuring they present their best candidate
before the electorate in 2015. Many Nigerians are also gearing up for the elections
as most conversations now centre on the coming elections or the roles being
played by any of the many protagonists and antagonists in the political movies playing in Nigeria now. As we all
get closer to 2015, its quite important that we all protect out votes and
ensure that we report any electoral criminality that we may observe or suspect. 

An example of such criminality is the improper use of Voter’s
cards as provided for in  Section 120 of the Electoral Act 2010 which provides that –
Any person who –

  • being entitled to a Voter’s card, gives it to some other
    person for use at an election other than an officer and acting in the course of
    his duty under the act;
  • not being an officer acting in the course of his duty under
    the Act, receives any voters card in the name of some other person or persons
    for use at an election uses it fraudulently;
  •  without lawful excuse has in his possession more than one Voter’s
    card; or 
  •  buys, sells, procures or deals, with a voters card otherwise
    than as provided in the Act: commits an offence and is liable on conviction to
    a maximum fine of N1,000,000 (One million naira) ir imprisonment for 12 months
    or both.  

From the abovce provisons of the law, it is obvious anyone
caught commiting such criminality will have some explaining to do and possibly
some jail term to serve or fine to pay, thus it’s important no one participates
in such acts. Please share this article with as many people as you can to
discourage electoral offences. 
Adedunmade Onibokun, Esq
@adedunmade