We must learn from Uche Wisdom Durueke’s legacy | Dele Adesina SAN

We must learn from Uche Wisdom Durueke’s legacy | Dele Adesina SAN

On behalf of my colleagues and I at Dele Adesina LP, I commiserate with members of the Owerri Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association and our foremost rights group, the Civil Liberties Organization (CLO), on the loss of the National President, Mr. Uche Wisdom Durueke, Esq, who passed away yesterday, Thursday, 14th of May, due to injuries he sustained during an unfortunate domestic fire accident.
Mr. Uche Wisdom Durueke, Esq., an Owerri-based member of our Association and human rights activist, was always focal on the protection of human rights and rule of law. His contributions to societal development and to humanity will always be a legacy to learn from and abide in. 
My condolences to his family, members of the NBA Owerri Branch and the good people of Imo State on the loss of their illustrous son and our brother. 
I pray his gentle soul rests in peace. 
Dele Adesina SAN
Dele Adesina, SAN: Praise Singing is a Hard Job | Adeboye ‘Seye Thompson

Dele Adesina, SAN: Praise Singing is a Hard Job | Adeboye ‘Seye Thompson

Asese tun se
ti a ba se yi tan, a o se mi si
asese tun se

(There would always be a repeat.
After this, you will have another event
There would always be a repeat.)

Pardon my crude translation of this Yoruba proverb but it was the best I could come up with in the circumstances. A major part of my growing up was spent supporting my dad who pastored our church (a quite small one). My church had a self-acclaimed master talking drummer who was always fond of playing with his talking drum the above-highlighted proverb, usually used to sing the praises of patrons and equally praying that such wonderful event would recur. Our talking drummer, however, met his ‘waterloo’ when he played this proverb with his talking drum at the burial ceremony of a 40-year old man who had died in a ghastly motor accident. The rest as they say is history! Such is the enormity of praise singing that I rarely embark on it as it could lead to the opposite of one’s intention. How else can you qualify the act of a woman singing “be thou exhausted” while trying to worship God? Her intentions of exalting God almost got Baba God exhausted. That’s on a lighter note, sure we know Baba God can never get exhausted.
Writing about Dele Adesina SAN, could sometimes be seen as praise singing by an average reader, but the fact is, one can hardly be immodest while talking about the learned Silk. William Hazlitt (1778-1830) famously noted that “the greatest offence against virtue is to speak ill of it.” You would never find me speaking ill of a man of virtue like Deacon Adesina SAN. One virtue has particularly stood out in Deacon’s interaction with people over time and this is the virtue of modesty. This coupled with his deep understanding of the tasks ahead of him makes him a stand-out candidate for the office of President of the Bar. It is not uncommon for him to use phrases like ‘by the grace of God’, ‘God willing,’ etc.
Against the background of easily the busiest and most challenging period the NBA and the world at large has seen in recent times, calmness and yet precision are unarguably key assets the next NBA Boss needs to have. *Talking about calmness, candour, precision, integrity, experience and capability, the learned Silk Adesina has them in abundance.* He is not flatulent (borrowing Prof Olu Obafemi’s word in the poem “Do Gooders”) and his spot-on answers to questions posed at him depict him as a reservoir of knowledge and as someone who is always prepared. His views on partnership as the future of the legal profession amongst other views depict him as someone who aptly understands the past, present and future of the legal profession. Bob Marley’s famous song title “Who the cap fits” is apt at describing the suitability of Deacon Adesina for this role. He is in the words of Confucius, the great one who possesses a perfect virtue resonating around ‘gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness and kindness.” He is who he is, the son of his father. I dare say that praise singing is hard afterall.
Since awaiting NCDC’s daily update has now become a routine, I hope and pray that Coronavirus will today afflict less Nigerians and indeed totally exit the world soonest.

I am Adeboye ‘Seye Thompson and I am a member of the Nigerian Bar Association.

PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTY ON GOODS/PERSONAL EFFECTS CONTAINED IN A PASSENGER’S BAGGAGE IS UNLAWFUL

PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTY ON GOODS/PERSONAL EFFECTS CONTAINED IN A PASSENGER’S BAGGAGE IS UNLAWFUL

 
On Wednesday, 13th May, 2020 the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division [Coram: J.T.Tsoho, CJ] delivered its judgment in Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN v. Nigerian Customs Service Board & Anor: Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1113/2019.  
 
The Plaintiff (Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN) via his counsel Tunde Ahmed Adejumo, Esq had approached the Court via an Originating Summons primarily seeking a declaration that in view of the provisions of Section 8 of the Customs, Excise Tariff, etc. (Consolidation) Act and the 2nd Schedule to the Customs, Excise Tariff, etc. (Consolidation) Act, it was unlawful for officers of the Nigerian Customs Service to have demanded and collected import duty and other related charges from the Plaintiff in respect of his personal effect (A Louis Vuitton Lap Top Bag) found in his baggage following a search by the officers of the Nigerian Customs Service upon his arrival at the Nnamdi Azikwe International Airport, Abuja on the 24th June, 2019.
 
The Court in its judgment having analysed the provisions of Section 8 of the Customs, Excise Tariff, etc. (Consolidation) Act and the 2nd Schedule to the Customs, Excise Tariff, etc. (Consolidation) Act was of the view that the following goods are exempted from import duty and other related charges:
 
1. Goods contained in a passenger’s baggage provided that the said goods are not intended for sale, barter or exchange; and
2. Personal and household effects.
 
The Court found that based on the state of the evidence before it, the Plaintiff had established that the Louis Vuitton Lap Top Bag found in his baggage by the officers of the Nigerian Customs Service was his personal effect and meant for his personal use.
 
The Court also found that before the Defendants could lawfully demand and collect import duty and other related charges in respect of the said Louis Vuitton Lap Top Bag found in the Plaintiff’s baggage, the Defendants had to establish via cogent and credible evidence that the said bag was meant for sale, exchange or barter.
 
Accordingly, the Defendants having failed to establish via evidence that the said bag found in the Plaintiff’s baggage was meant for sale, exchange or barter, there was no legal basis upon which the officers of the Nigerian Customs Service demanded and collected import duty and other related charges from the Plaintiff in respect of the said bag.
 
Finally, the Court having found that the decision and action of the Defendants to demand and collect from the Plaintiff import duty and other related charges in respect of his personal effect is unlawful, null and void ordered the Defendants to refund the sum of N156, 955. 20k (One Hundred and Fifty-Six Thousand, Nine Hundred and Fifty-Five Naira, Twenty Kobo) in import duty and other related charges to the Plaintiff and also to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of N5, 000, 000.00 (Five Million Naira) as exemplary damages.
 
Following this judgment, it is now unlawful for officers of the Nigerian Customs Service to demand and collect import duty and other related charges from anyone in respect of goods/personal effects found in their baggage provided that the said goods/personal effects are not meant for sale, barter or exchange. In other words, the only instance in which officers of the Nigerian Customs Service can lawfully demand and collect import duty from anyone in respect of goods/personal effects found in their baggage is where it can be established that the said goods/personal effects are meant for sale, barter or exchange.
Mrs. Akodu: The Loss of an Exemplary Legal Practitioner by Dele Adesina SAN

Mrs. Akodu: The Loss of an Exemplary Legal Practitioner by Dele Adesina SAN

My Colleagues and I at Dele Adesina LP express our condolences to our Learned Silk and former President of Nigerian Bar Association, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba SAN; the Chambers of Olisa Agbakoba Legal (O.A.L.); the members of Akodu Family and Nigerian Bar Association, Lagos Branch over the death of Mrs. Bisi Akodu.

Mrs. Bisi Akodu, the Managing Partner of O.A.L., died on Sunday, the 10th of May, 2020 at the age of 66 following a protracted illness which she fought with all her faith. She was an exemplary advocate, a passionate Legal Practitioner and a mentor to many subordinates. Her contribution to the development of our Jurisprudence and her impressive knowledge of the Nigerian Financial System was almost unrivalled.

It is an understatement to say that this hard-working, dedicated and committed Managing Partner will be greatly missed by her Families, both the blood family and of course her Professional family. It is our prayer that the Lord will give the Families the fortitude to bear the irreparable loss.

May her kind and gentle soul rest in peace.

Dele Adesina SAN

Mrs. Bisi Akodu was an astounding legal practitioner| Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs

Mrs. Bisi Akodu was an astounding legal practitioner| Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs

The news of Mrs. Bisi Akodu’s passing is a shock to the Nigerian legal community. I commiserate with Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, members of Olisa Agbakoba Legal, family members of Mrs. Akodu and members of the NBA Lagos Branch on this huge loss.

Mrs. Akodu was the Managing Partner (MP) and the head of OAL’s Corporate/Commercial Practice and Public Sector Group. She will be remembered as an advocate for change and for being an astounding professional and brilliant lawyer whose passion was always evident in all she did.

May her gentle soul rest in perfect peace!

Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs.
Past Vice – Chairman, NBA Ikeja)
#Integrity+accountability

Pro bono is a great way to build your skills| Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs

Pro bono is a great way to build your skills| Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs

In a democratic society like ours, lawyers play a vital role as the custodians of justice and in order to carry out that role sufficiently, it is a duty of lawyers to help promote access to justice. According to the 2018 Justice Needs and Satisfaction report by Hiil, there are 25 million legal problems per year in Nigeria. Furthermore, Low-income people are two times less likely to engage courts and more than three times less likely to engage lawyers than high-earners.

The report states that poor people are more likely to have their legal disputes ongoing and unresolved, compared with other better-off groups. Moreover, on average, the chances of obtaining an outcome increase in line with income levels. Richer people have access to more effective dispute resolution mechanisms.
This means there are a lot of low – earning individuals who are unable to seek legal redress for a breach of their rights, these class of people are therefore experiencing a failure of the justice system first hand. This problem can however be mitigated if lawyers who number in thousands took up more pro bono work.
Pro bono work means professional work undertaken voluntarily and without payment. It differs from traditional volunteering because it uses the specific skills of professionals to provide services to those who are unable to afford them. The need for legal services among the poor is overwhelming and the office of the public defender is not equipped to handle all matters in this class adequately.
As legal practitioners, there are quite a number of benefits to handling pro bono work such as diversity of experience, opportunities for collaboration, provides a sense of self – fulfillment and helps lawyers build skills. Pro bono helps young lawyers gain experience and build their skill sets. It also satisfies the responsibility of lawyers to the society. The Nigerian Bar Association has always encouraged members to participate actively in pro bono matters and local branches are often championing pro bono causes within their jurisdictions.
For instance, as the Vice – Chairman of the NBA Ikeja Branch between 2016- 2018, I headed the Human Rights Committee and the branch undertook numerous pro bono cases. We were also able to organize several events on topics bothering on human rights for the benefit of the public. I was able to observe first-hand the benefits of taking up pro bono work. I urge my fellow colleagues to actively take on pro bono work for the benefit of our local communities as in the words of Janet Reno – I think lawyers who engage in pro bono service to protect those who cannot help themselves are truly the heroes and the heroines of the legal profession.
Caroline Ibharuneafe, Mrs.
Past Vice – Chairman, NBA Ikeja)
#Integrity+accountability
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING VIRTUAL OR REMOTE HEARINGS BY THE JUDICIARY IN NIGERIA

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING VIRTUAL OR REMOTE HEARINGS BY THE JUDICIARY IN NIGERIA

Since the announcement of the Covid-19 scourge all over the world and particularly the announcement of the index case in Lagos, Nigeria on 19 March, 2020 by Professor Akin Abayomi, Commissioner for Health in Lagos State, governments at both the Federal and State levels have adopted various strategies aimed at containing the spread including restrictions on human and vehicular movements, business, religious and social activities (except those designated ESSENTIAL) and so on.

As a consequence, people and institutions affected by these regulations of government have both adapted and devised various ways to keep up with the times. Many businesses, educational and religious organisation have since adopted the ONLINE/VIRTUAL mediums to further their objectives.
The legal industry has practically grinded to a halt in this period as the Courts at all levels have been shut to avoid human interaction which could exacerbate the increasing infection rate in the country, save for a few Courts tasked with hearing cases associated with breaches of government regulations on Covid-19 and other matters which are considered time bound or extremely important. Although, a few lawyers have made a case for legal services to be deemed ESSENTIAL so as to guarantee the rights of Nigerian citizens to access justice and fair hearing, these pleas have not been heeded.
Recently, different jurisdictions have through their Chief Justices issued Practice Directions aimed at accommodating Remote and/or Virtual Court sittings. Even the Chief Justice of Nigeria have constituted a committee to look at the suitability of adopting virtual or remote Court proceedings.
While the various effort by the heads of the various Courts must be commended as the aim is to protect the lives and wellbeing of litigants, practioners and those saddled with managing administration of justice in our country, the legality of these actions should not be overlooked.
Administration of Justice in Nigeria is governed by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) herein referred to as “CFRN 1999” and several other legislations including rules of Courts. For example, Secrion 36(3) of the CFRN 1999 (as amended) makes it clear that Court proceedings and the Judgment thereof must be held in public. Some have argued that virtual proceedings qualify as “proceedings held in public” in support of the adoption of virtual or remote hearings. This is however not supported by any legal authority known to Nigerian jurisprudence.
The obvious flaws in the adoption of a technology which obviate the need for physical Court Rooms and procedure clearly spelt out by our body of laws cannot be overlooked. Recently, the legal community in Nigeria received the news of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria which set aside the conviction of a former governor of Abia State, Chief Orji Uzor Kalu on the grounds that the judge which convicted him at the trial Court had been elevated to the Court of Appeal as at the date when the trial was concluded. Although the judge did so with the fiat of the President of the Court of Appeal who in turn made same pursuant to Section 396 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), the Supreme Court nullified the proceedings as the ACJA provisions cannot supersede the CFRN 1999 (as amended). This is an example of the fate that will befall any proceeding which is not in tandem with the spirit and letters of our grundnorm.
For want of time, I will not state in details the many examples of our criminal and civil proceedings that cannot be conducted via remote or virtual platforms without conflicting with existing legislations. I will rather advise that the Practice Directions being issued should be reworked and passed in the form of a Bill to the legislative arm of government at both the National and State levels for onward passage as an Act and Laws respectively.
It is worthy of reiterating here that no matter how well intended and worded these Practice Directions are packaged, they cannot supplant the CFRN 1999 (as amended) or other express or implied provisions of statutes.
Babatunde Busari, Esq.
10/5/2020
Lagos, Nigeria
Babatunde Busari is the Managing Partner and Team Lead at Babatunde Busari & Co., a firm of lawyers with focus on Commercial Law; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Civil and Criminal Litigation; Real and Intellectual Property Law; Banking Law; Oil and Gas Law; Regulatory Compliance; Family and Probate Laws. Babatunde is an ardent reader, writer and researcher.
Join the CJN, Appeal Court President and other Legal Industry Players at the Webinar organized by Wole Olanipekun & Co.

Join the CJN, Appeal Court President and other Legal Industry Players at the Webinar organized by Wole Olanipekun & Co.

The law firm of Wole Olanipekun and Co, tomorrow 11th May, 2020 will be hosting a Webinar titled “Legal and Infrastructural considerations for remote court proceedings in Nigeria” and several policy influencers in the justice sector are billed to attend including the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, President of the Acting Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, and several other jurists.

Attendance of these eminent legal personalities has been confirmed by the Managing Partner of the firm, who also mentioned that several other dignitaries across Nigeria have signified their intention to attend the virtual discourse.
He said: “In view of the number of pre-registered attendees and those who have shown interest, the capacity of the Webinar has been increased from the initially anticipated 500 participants to now accommodate 1,000 participants”.
The webinar will feature five prominent and highly cerebral speakers namely: Hon. Justice Kashim Zannah, the Chief Judge of Borno State (who also chairs the Judicial Information Technology Policy Committee), Moyosore Onigbanjo, SAN (the Attorney-General of Lagos State), Prof. Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, Femi Falana, SAN and Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, former Chairman, National Human Rights Commission.
To participate, please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85354787152?pwd=dnFhZlZLWXZ0V1JuYlRGNXRPeDdoQT09
Password: woc2020
Webinar ID: 853 5478 7152
Password: 596962
IMPACTFUL JUSTICE DELIVERY: FOCUS ON PRACTITIONERS | Dele Adesina SAN

IMPACTFUL JUSTICE DELIVERY: FOCUS ON PRACTITIONERS | Dele Adesina SAN

Justice is key in any society. No society can prosper without justice. So my plan is to draw the concentrated attention of the participants to Justice Administration in our society and the challenges militating against an effective, efficient, fulfilling and impactful justice delivery in Nigeria with particular focus on the Legal Practitioners.

As an active player, I want to state that the challenges confronting Justice Administration in Nigeria is systemic, structural and attitudinal in nature. For me however, the greatest impediment to impactful justice delivery whereby everyone involved will get value and fulfilment is an attitudinal problem. No matter how bad a system or structure may be, if the practitioners do the right thing, apply the right approach and take the right step, the effect of the inadequacy of the system and structure can be mitigated. This is why I am focusing on the practitioners.

Whether as an Advocate or a Commercial Legal Practitioner, the end that we seek for our clients is Justice, Justice, and Justice!!!

However, it is not an overstatement to say that the practitioners of the system either as Advocates, both private and commercial and Judges on the Bench erect various impediments to getting impactful justice. That is to say getting speedy justice that will fulfil the expectations of the people without delay and or procrastination as is the case in Nigeria today. It is common knowledge that cases last in some instance for as much as 10-15-20 years journeying from the High Court to the Supreme Court. Arbitration which throughout the world is known as an alternative dispute resolution is also failing to meet its target. Examples abound in Nigeria that arbitral awards are also gradually becoming a cause of action rather than resolution of a dispute between contending parties.

How about endless adjournments, frivolous applications, frivolous interlocutory appeals, frivolous petitions against opposing Counsel and even in some cases against trial Judges. All on the part of the Practitioners at the Bar. On the part of the Bench, you see negative attitude to innovations, late sittings or not sitting at all, lack of proper apprehension of the Rules and lack of the necessary will to enforce the Rules. These are some of the frustrating attitudes of the Practitioners in achieving positive justice. We have got to change this negative attitude if we want results that will be positively impactful to the users of the system. Everyone’s attitude determines his/ her altitude.

The Legal Profession is a highly regulated profession with a standard code of conduct to guide and moderate our operations. Unfortunately, it appears to me that like any other law in Nigeria, the enforcement of this standard code of conduct is less effective; hence, impunity reigns supreme. The time has come for us to begin to do things in a different way so that we can get a different result. Otherwise, the Profession will be gone before we know it.

To address these challenges mentioned above, proper attention must be focused on our disciplinary procedure in order to ensure that smart but procedurally wrong steps are made sanctionable. A Counsel who files frivolous suits must be sanctioned for failure to offer proper professional advice to clients. The same goes for Counsel who take pleasure in defending the indefensible. After all, it is a professional misconduct for a Counsel to urge a defence he does not believe in on the Court.

We have argued over and over again that interlocutory appeals be made to terminate at the Court if Appeal. For me nothing stops the total termination of interlocutory appeals so that whatever dissatisfaction against any Ruling should be taken together with the substantive judgment. Something similar to what operates in election petition cases.

Before anybody challenges any arbitral award, the challenger must be made to deposit the award into an interest yielding account. These I submit will stop many frivolous cases challenging a properly rendered award by an arbitral panel. Most of the cases are to exhaust the patience of the other party and render the award useless.

Our Judges must come back to the days of old of erudity and industry when Bench Rulings are delivered promptly in respect of contentious applications instead of the usual adjournments that we witness today on any little argument. It is said that an ignorant Judge is a calamity to the society. Of course, the Rules of procedure must be obeyed including award of costs in accordance to the Rules for any shortcoming by Counsel.

The Lawyers must hold their duties to justice as a minister in the temple of justice superior to any other duty by doing the proper thing most expeditiously.

DELE ADESINA SAN
Excerps from an interactive session with Mr. Dele Adesina SAN and members of the NBA Nigeria- KYA group on Whatsapp on 9th May, 2020.