YOU HAVE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT IF POLICE ARREST YOU

YOU HAVE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT IF POLICE ARREST YOU


 

Credit – www.patrol-log.com

I have seen a number of
Hollywood movies where upon arrest by the police, the suspect is read his
rights. This means the suspect has been mirandized. This experience is however
different from  Nollywood movies, where
upon arrest, a suspect is told that he would be informed of the reason for his
arrest when he gets to the police station. If this is actually the reality in
Nigeria, then I must say the Nigerian police force is doing something wrong.

The doctrine of Miranda can
be traced to the case of  Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436,86. S.Ct
1602 (1966)
.
This case discussed the admissibility of statements obtained during. It states that a criminal suspect in police custody must be
informed of certain constitutional rights before being interrogated. For
instance, the suspect must have been advised of the right to remain silent, the
right to have an attorney present during questioning and the right to have an
attorney appointed if the suspect cannot afford one. 
In the U.S and some other
legal jurisdictions, when the suspect is not advised of these rights or does
not waive them, any evidence obtained during the interrogation cannot be used
against the suspect at trial. Though, this is not the case in Nigeria, the
Miranda rule is not restricted to other legal jurisdictions as we have a
similar provision of law in Section 6 of
the Administration of Criminal Act 2015
provides that:
6(1)
Except when the suspect is in the actual course of the commission of an offence
or is pursued immediately after the commission of an offence or has escaped
from lawful custody, the police officer or other persons making the arrest
shall inform the suspect immediately of the reason for the arrest.
(2)
The police officer or the person making the arrest or the police officer in
charge of a police station shall inform the suspect of his rights to:
a.
remain silent or avoid answering any question until after consultation with a
legal practitioner or any other person of his own choice;
b.
consult a legal practitioner of his choice before making, endorsing or writing
any statement or answering any question put to him after arrest; and  
c.
free legal representation by the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria where applicable;
provided the authority having custody of the suspect shall have the
responsibility of notifying the next of kin or relative of the suspect of the
arrest at no cost to the suspect.
Credits – nigeriapoliticsonline.com
In the past, we have heard
of police officers who abuse their powers, however, we must always demand a
high level of professionalism from the police and other security agencies.
Therefore, please share this blog and inform as many people as you can. Thank
you. 
Adedunmade Onibokun, Esq.
@adedunmade
TIME TO SERVE A QUIT NOTICE

TIME TO SERVE A QUIT NOTICE


Credits – housingrights.co.uk
 A
landlord has an unfettered legal right to terminate a tenancy upon giving
adequate notice. This is because the property is his and he can at any time
retrieve it subject to the conditions of the tenancy agreement. Once he abides
by the provisions of the tenancy agreement, the tenant has no choice than to
vacate possession. If the tenant refuses to quit, a court of law can, on an
action by the landlord, force him out of the premises. 
Many
Landlords and Tenants have been mixed up in endless court battles and rigorous
negotiations and/or arguments over notices to quit. The arguments of many
tenants have been that the notices are invalid or not properly served while
Landlords believe otherwise. This is a quick attempt to clear the air on the
issue. 

In
order to recover possession of his premises, a landlord must determine the
tenancy, by service on the tenant of the appropriate notice to quit depending
on the type of tenancy. 
Some
tenancy agreements provide for the length of notices and must be strictly
adhered to when it does, however Section
14
of the Lagos State Rent Control
and Recovery of Residential Premises
law states that –
    1. Where there is no express
stipulation as to the notice to be given by either party to determine the
tenancy, the following periods of time shall be given –
a)   
In the case of a tenancy
at will or a weekly tenancy, a week’s notice.
b)   
In the case of a monthly
tenancy, a month’s notice;
c)    
In the case of a yearly
tenancy, half a year’s notice. 
On
the determination of the tenancy, the tenant should be served with the
statutory 7 days’ notice of the landlord’s intention to recover possession of
the premises. Thereafter, the action can be filed in court. It should be noted
that service of valid quit notices is a precondition for the recovery of
possession by the Landlord. 
It
is settledthat a notice to quit in order to be effective ought to determine the
tenancy at the end of the current term of the tenancy as illustrated in the
case of African Petroleum Ltd. V.
Owodunni (1991) 8 NWLR (Pt 210) 391
. For instance, a notice of six months
is necessary to determine a yearly tenancy and such notice must terminate the
tenancy at the end of the current term of the tenancy. Thus any notice given to
end at the middle of the term of the tenancy will be invalid. This was
illustrated in Akpokiniovo V. Air
Liquide Nigeria Plc (2012) LPELR – 9582(CA). 
Where
a tenant for a fixed term refuses at the expiration of his tenancy to vacate
possession and wrongfully, that is, without the consent
of the landlord, continues in possession, he would be a tenant at sufferance.
This arises where a tenant at sufferance, holds over without the landlord’s
assent or dissent. What is important to note is that, if a notice to quit does
not follow the stipulated time prescribed by law, it is not valid.
AdedunmadeOnibokun,
Esq.
@adedunmade