Features of good tax system By Michael Olulenu

Features of good tax system By Michael Olulenu

 
TAXES
are the enforced propor­tional contributions from
persons and property, levied by the state by virtue of its sovereignty for the
support of government and for all public need. From the above definition it is
seen that taxes are contributions to a common pool by the people for the use of
the people. Government all over the world need taxes in order to sustain its
relevance and to provide for the needs of its citizenry.
A tax system
is expected to be fair and non-discriminatory. For a tax system to meet these
require­ments, it must have the following attributes.

  • Neutral
A Neutral tax
must be unbiased across economic activities, and not overly penalize work in
favour of leisure, nor tax income used for saving and investment more heav­ily
than income used for consump­tion.
  • Visibility
A very large
segment of the population must be keenly aware that government costs money, gov­ernment
spending should be held to levels at which its benefits match its costs. This
is a critical factor in most developing countries (includ­ing Nigeria) where
the citizenry believe that tax revenues are not being expeditiously
administered.
  • Fairness
This is often
stated as making the rich pay higher share of their in­come in taxes than the
poor. There should be some amount of income exempt from tax to shelter the poor­est
citizens.
  • Simplicity
A tax system
should be easy for the government to administer and enforce, and be easy and
inexpen­sive for taxpayers to comply with. There should be clear definition of
income and elimination of multiple layers of tax would create a system that is
much simpler and easier to administer, enforce and comply with. These are
critical issues in Nigeria tax systems that require ur­gent attention. Our tax
laws are old and complex, given room for varied interpretations and
applications.
  • Convenience
A good tax
system should be convenient in terms of time and mode of payment to the
taxpayer.
  • Administrative Efficiency
The process of
levying and collecting taxes must be adminis­tratively efficient, transparent
and economical without any distortion.
  • Productive
A tax system
should be such that brings in sufficient revenue to the Government. Since tax
payment involves the outflow of money or money’s worth from the treasury of
taxpayers, some Taxpayers have adopted many strategies to evade tax, tax
evasion is defined as “the wilful attempt to defeat or circumvent the tax law
in order to legally reduce one’s tax liability”. Tax evasion is punishable by
both civil and criminal penalties.
Tax avoidance
on the order hand, is defined as “the act of taking advantage of legally
available tax-planning opportunities in order to minimize one’s tax liability.
While tax evasion is criminal tax avoidance is legal. This was aptly supported
by the celebrated case of Ayrshir Pullman Motor Services & D.U. Ritche
V.CIR (1929). The fact of the case and the judgement is as follows:-
The taxpayer
changed the structure of its business from sole proprietorship to partnership
with 5 of his children to minimise tax. He appealed to the Court of Session
against an assessment which failed to recognise the change. Allowing the
appeal, Lord Clyde held:
No man in this
country is under the smallest obligation, moral or other, to so arrange his
legal rela­tions to his business or property as to enable Revenue to put the
largest possible shovel into his stores. The Inland Revenue is not slow…. and
quite rightly to take every advan­tage which is open to it under the taxing
statutes for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer’s pocket. And the taxpayer
in like manner is entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can,
the depletion of his means by the Revenue.
Tax
compliance tools
In order to
encourage compliance taxpayers to continue to comply, and bring non compliance
taxpay­ers into the tax net, to increase tax base and revenue, governments all
over the world have put in place some compliance strategies backed by
appropriate legislations.
Section 26(1)
of the Federal Inland Revenue Service Establish­ment Act (FIRSEA) 26(1) gives
the Service to call for returns, books, documents and information.
FIRSEA 27 –
Gives additional power to the Service to call for further returns and payment
of tax due.
FIRSEA 28 –
Requires every bank upon demand by the Service to provide quarterly returns
specify­ing:-
  • In the cases of an individual, all transaction involving the sum of
    N5,000,000.00 and above
  • In the case of a body corporate, all transactions involving the sum
    of N10,000,000.00 and above, the names and address of all custom­ers of
    the bank connected with the transactions and deliver the returns to the
    Service.
  • Section 28 (3) – Provides sanc­tion to any bank that contravenes
    above provisions.
FIRSEA 29 –
Gives power to access lands, buildings, books and documents
FIRSEA 32 –
Gives power of ad­dition for non-payment of tax and enforcement of payment.
FIRSEA 33 –
Tax Investiga­tion; this section empowers the Service to employ special purpose
Tax officers to assist any relevant law enforcement agency in the investigation
of any offence under this Act.
FIRSEA 47 –
Gives the Service powers to prosecute any of the of­fences under this Act
subject to the powers of the Attorney – General of the Federation.
The
role of tax audit
In addition to
all the tax provi­sions mentioned above, FIRSEA S:26(4) and S.60(4) CITA went
further to state:-
“Nothing in
any other provision of this Act shall be constructed as precluding the Service
from verifying by tax audit or investiga­tion into any matter relating to any
return or entry in any book, document, accounts including those stored, on a
computer, in digital, magnetic, optical or electronic media as may, from time
to time, be specified in any guideline by the Service”.
All the above
provisions, among others, are compliance tools meant to ensure that a taxpayer
does not pay less or more than what he is required to pay by law. This objec­tive
is achieved through tax audit exercises.
The purposes
of tax audit are to:-
  • To educate taxpayers
  • Maintain self assessment system
  • Collect taxes as imposed by the laws through the encouragement of
    voluntary compliance
  • Maintain public confidence in the integrity of tax system.
  • Provide deterrent effects on other taxpayers not yet audited, as
    they may quickly file their returns in order to avoid sanctions.
 
 Michael Olulenu
JAIL TERM FOR ISSUING DUD CHEQUES

JAIL TERM FOR ISSUING DUD CHEQUES

Credits – thejournal.ie
In doing business, cheques
play a big role in sorting financial obligations. Cheques are either given to
be cashed immediately at the bank or paid into an account. Cheques can also be
post-dated cheques, which cannot be exchanged for cash until a certain future
date. It’s the custom of high risk business persons to sign a cheque for a
future date with the intention of funding their accounts before the date in
order for the cheque to clear. However, in the past, some shady persons issue
cheques knowing there was no money in their account and having received a
service or good in return will suddenly become untraceable. Such an act is
however against the law as anyone who gives out a dishonoured cheque will be
committing a crime and be liable to punishment by the court.

The Dishonoured Cheques
(Offences) Act provides that anyone who obtains anything capable of being
stolen or obtains credit by means of a cheque, which when presented for payment
not later than six months after the date of the cheque, is dishonoured on the
ground that the account had insufficient funds shall be guilty of an offence
and in the case of an individual be liable to imprisonment for 2 years; and if it’s
a corporate body shall be liable to a fine not less than N5,000 (Five
Thousand Naira).
However, if the person can
show that he reasonably thought the cheque will be honoured, he shall not be
found guilty. The proper court to sue such a person will however be the High
Court of the State where the act occurred. Thus, it is very important to note
when doing business that issuing dishonoured cheques comes with a price.
 Adedunmade Onibokun Esq.
@adedunmade
Corporate Dilemma by Ahudiya Ukiwe

Corporate Dilemma by Ahudiya Ukiwe



Before admission into the University and upon graduation from Law School, I had always known the furthest of my ambitions and from my mind was litigation practice. I always envisioned me surrounded by documents, contracts, laptops, not at a law firm but in some other aspect of the corporate world. My goals were resolutely set at Corporate Governance and Company Secretaryship.

It was therefore no surprise to my schoolmates to hear I was in the Banking Industry. More importantly so, the Legal department. There were and are (and probably always will be) the banters of having deserted the core of law practice for the comfort of a lush office. Honestly, I have given up the will to scold or try to understand.

Always baffling is the IGNORANT distinction people  (lawyers and non-lawyers) make of the legal practice. It is regarded that anything short of adorning the wig and gown, attendance in court and display of argumentative capabilities (whether or not called for) is not legal practice. To the scholars of this thought, I say- to thyself be true, be honestly true.

However, (not aligning myself with the “scholars”), I dare say there is the tendency to fall into a rut of some sort, a lax, laid-back attitude. There seems to be no urgent need to be acquainted with case law, statutory changes etc as external counsel are the go-to persons if such information is required. The need to be abreast of developments and information is vital to a lawyer and his career, especially given the perception of lawyers as knowledge repositories.

For any career-driven individual, the satisfaction of any job is the (quick) rise to the top. I mean, irrespective of the salary or bonuses or profit sharing (P.S) received, without the climb, one’s career is simply stunted. Conscious of the above, I was recently faced with the ultimate (okay, maybe quasi-ultimate)  choice. To choose between my comfort zone and a higher grade, better pay. Now, let me rebut your rebuttable presumption: movement from Legal functions (one extreme) to Operations (another extreme). Also, to be unambiguous, money has never quite been a driving force or a decisive factor when considering job switch. 

I eventually decided to fall out of my hitherto rut and “taste” the other. Hopefully, my choice does not backfire. Regardless, (ideal) advice is to endeavour to enjoy one’s job, so it does not seem as “work”. 

N.B. Realistically, even though  our economic situation does not allow for such choice of jobs, we could make the best out of whatever.

By: Ahudiya Ukiwe

Proposed VAT increment: Common man’s nightmare

Proposed VAT increment: Common man’s nightmare

Credit – Google

The Federal
Government is set to increase Value Added Tax from its current rate of 5% on
goods and services to 10%. It was disclosed on Friday 7th of August
2015 by Mr. Sunday Ogungbesan, Acting Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service
(FIRS), while speaking with the media.
According to him,
increasing the VAT was one of the measures being considered by the Federal
Government to shore up the revenue of the country that had suffered a slide
since the slump in crude oil price started last year. Nigeria earns about 80
per cent of its revenue from oil exports.
If you are a fellow
in the Chartered Institute of Taxation or you have a degree in Finance, you can
skip this article. The purpose of it is to try to explain the effect of the
proposed increment of VAT on Nigerians and Nigerian businesses.

What
is VAT
First thing to know
is what VAT really means? Who imposes and who suffers it?
 What is exempted from
Tax?
VAT is a consumption
tax payable on the goods and service consumed by any person, whether government
agencies, business organizations or individuals. The target of VAT is
consumption of goods and services and unless an item is specifically exempted
by law, the consumer is liable to the tax. It can also be defined as a tax on
spending/consumption levied at every stage of a transaction but eventually
borne by the final consumer of such goods and services. It is levied at the
rate of 5%. 
In Nigeria, the VAT
system started with acceptance of the recommendation of a study group on
indirect taxation in November, 1991. The decision to accept the recommendation
was made public in the 1992 budget speech of the Head of State. This resulted
in setting up the Modified Value-Added Tax (MVAT) committee as recommended by the
study group. Tax administration was however given to federal Inland Revenue
Services (FIRS).
Value-Added Tax is
tax on the supply of good and services which is eventually born by the final
consumer but all collected at each stage of production and distribution chain.
With VAT, government reasoned, it will be virtually impossible to evade tax.
 

Credit – Google

Items
exempted from VAT
VAT exempts essential
goods such as all medical and pharmaceutical product basic food, books and
educational material, newspapers and magazines, baby products, fertilizer
agricultural and veterinary medicine, farming transportation equipment. While,
services exempted include medical services, services rendered by community
bank’s, people’s bank and mortgage institution as part of learning. All
diplomatic items are exempted as covered by international agreements and
airline tickets for international travel. You practically pay tax on every
other thing that does not fall in this category.
VAT
from 5% to 10%
The proposed increase
will be very unfair to the Nigerian populace if it is based on the fact that
the rate of vat which is 5% as stipulated in section 4 of the Vat Act 1993 is
one of the lowest rates in the world, as claimed by the FIRS acting boss.
Studies have shown
that other countries with higher rates have got a lot to show for it, in terms
of good infrastructural facilities and social amenities in the country that is
adequately sufficient and highly beneficial to citizens.
This is seen to be a
severe austerity measure on the masses in the long run, considering the fact
that every individual in the country has to consume goods and services that are
vatable in other to survive, since it is charged on almost all consumable
products.
Increase
of the VAT rate will cause
;
• Death of startup
companies
Increase in VAT rate
will make operating expenses consume a huge part of their revenue, and they are
left with the option of providing for themselves what is meant to be provided
by the government for them to continue in business. It is pertinent to note
that a manufacturer battling with little or no profit, will find it unbearable
paying the increased tax on their minimum profit.
• Increase in
Inflation rate
Manufacturers, who
are opportunists, will take advantage of the increase in vat rate, to shoot up
their prices. Government wants to get a part of the insufficient income left
with the citizens, who are left with the only option to spend majorly on
necessities. There is always an adverse effect on the economy.
Other possible disadvantages
of the implementation is regressive effect on low income earners leading to
poor savings, intractable increase price level (even beer, suya and sharwama
sellers will increase prices like a loose cannon) and practical difficulties of
implementing the VAT rate.
In conclusion, it is
therefore advisable that the legislature and other critical stakeholders should
frown at this heartbreaking revenue generation policy government is about to embark on (in the interest of the people).
By: Sogo Akinola 

Sogo Akinola Nathan is
a young commercial lawyer at GbengaBiobaku and co. He specializes in Taxation,
oil and gas law and Real Estate. He is a graduate of ObafemiAwolowo University
and the Nigerian Law School. He is a member of the Nigerian Bar Association and
a member of the Association of Young International lawyers and  Young International Arbitration Group and also
an intending associate member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria

Dismissal of a director who has gone missing by Kayode Omosehin

Dismissal of a director who has gone missing by Kayode Omosehin


Credits – Google


Preliminary View
The statutory removal of a director
generally is governed by the provision of section 262 of the Companies and
Allied Matters Act, Cap C20 LFN 2004 (“CAMA”). In the case of Longe v FBN
Plc (2010) 6 NWLR (Pt 1189) SC 1
, the Supreme Court held that the provision
of section 262 of CAMA also applies to removal of executive and non-executive
director alike. However, it appears that different consideration should apply
where a director sought to be removed has disappeared or gone missing. Let us
consider some of the issues that may play out in the course of removing a
director who is missing.

Statutory Procedure for Removing
Directors
The procedure in section 262 of CAMA to
be adopted in removing an executive director is summarized as follows:
1.     A Special notice of
the meeting to remove a director must be issued to all plenary members of the
board of directors and a copy of the notice must be served on the director. A
special notice according to section 236 of CAMA is a notice of twenty-eight
(28) days given before a meeting holds. The notice shall specify the place,
date and time of the meeting, and the general nature of the business to be
transacted at the meeting (i.e. removal of the director) in sufficient details
to enable those to whom it is given decide whether to attend or not. The
director (whether or not he is a member of the company) shall be entitled to be
heard on the resolution at the meeting. See Section 262 (2) of CAMA. 
1.     Where the special
notice mentioned above is given and the director concerned makes a
representations in writing to the company in respect of the special notice (not
exceeding a reasonable length) and requests their circulation to members of the
company, the company shall, unless the representations are received by it too
late for it to do so-
 (a) state the fact of the
representations having been made by the director in any notice of the
resolution issued to members of the company; and
 (b) Send a copy of the
representations to every member of the company to whom notice of the meeting is
sent (whether before or after receipt of the representations by the company);
See section 262 (3) CAMA
 (c) If a copy of the
representations is not sent out to board members either because it is received
too late or because of the company’s default, the executive director to be
removed may (without prejudice to his right to be heard orally) request that
the representations shall be read out at the meeting.
 (d) However, the copies of the
representations need not be sent out and the representations need not be read
out at the meeting if,
  • on
    the application either of the company or
  • any
    other person who claims to be aggrieved,
the court is satisfied that the rights
to make representation are being abused to secure needless publicity for
defamatory matter and the court may order the company’s costs on an application
under section 262 to be paid in whole or in part by the director,
notwithstanding that he is not a party to the application.
The above means that representations of
the director to be removed may not be circulated to plenary members or read at
the meeting. However,  in order to prevent the circulation of the
director’s representations to board members or from being read at the meeting where
the executive director is to be removed, a prior order of court must be
obtained by either the company or any other interested person. 
1.     Where the board of
directors is of the view that the allegation against the executive director
concerned is proved, the board shall pass a simple resolution to remove him.
Where there is no proof of the allegations, the procedure ends here. The
director should be allowed to continue with his duties. 
1.     The resolution by
which the director is removed shall be filed with CAC within fifteen (15) days
and where a new director is appointed to fill the vacancy, a CAC Form 7 (Change
of Directors and Particulars of Directors) must be filled and filed with CAC.
All the correspondence materials of the company should then be corrected to
reflect the new changes.
Can the Company Remove a Director by
any other means?
Section 262 (6) of CAMA appears to
permit a company to deviate from the procedure discussed above in removing a
director where a different mode of removal is provided in a binding agreement
between the company and the director (e.g. Contract of Service) or where the
Articles of Association provides that the company can remove the executive
director in any other manner. Section 262 (6) of CAMA provides as follows:
 “Nothing in this section shall
be taken as depriving a person removed under it of compensation or damages
payable to him in respect of the termination of his appointment as a director
or of any appointment terminating with that as director, or as derogating from
any power to remove a director which may exist apart from this section.”
 However, the Supreme Court in Longe
v. FBN Plc (supra)
, failed to advert its mind to the clear and unambiguous
provision above and held that the procedure for removal of a director in
Section 262 (1), (2) and (3) of CAMA is mandatory and that same applies to all
directors, both executive and non-executive notwithstanding anything contrary
in a contract of service between the company and the director. The sum total of
the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in that case, which ought to be the
preferred view, was that Mr. Bernard Longe being a managing director of the
First Bank Plc employed through a contract of service can be removed by the
bank in accordance with the said contract. Sadly, however, the Supreme Court
rejected the reasoning holding that the definition of directors in the CAMA
does not permit such distinction.
 

Credits – Google

Where a Director to be removed is
missing for seven (7) years or more
In a special circumstance, where a
director to be removed is missing, the procedure to be adopted depends on the
number of years for which the executive director has gone missing. Under
Nigerian law, a person who has gone missing may be presumed dead in accordance
with Section 164 (1) of the Evidence Act 2011 if he has been missing without
being heard of for seven (7) years by those, if any, who would naturally have
heard of him if he had been alive.
Where a director has gone missing for
seven (7) or more years, the law presumes the executive director to be dead in
accordance with Section 164 (1) of the Evidence Act 2011 if he has been missing
without being heard of by those, if any, who would naturally have heard of him
if he had been alive. In the said circumstances, the removal of such missing
director is automatic by operation of law i.e. the CAMA. This can be inferred
from the provisions of Section 249 (1) of CAMA which provides that “The
board of directors shall have power to appoint new directors to fill any casual
vacancy arising out of death, resignation, retirement or removal.”
It is useful to mention that the onus
of proof of the fact that a missing director has been so missing for seven (7)
years or more lies squarely on the company which is acting through the board of
directors.
Where a Director to be removed is
missing for less than seven (7) years
In order to remove a director who has
gone missing for less than seven (7) years, the provisions of Section 262 (1),
(2) and (3) of CAMA provide for the procedure for removal. It is appreciated
however that a missing person may be difficult (or impossible) to be served
with a notice of a meeting as required by Section 262 (2) of CAMA. The
difficulty can be taken care of by resorting to provisions of Section 220 (1)
and (2) of CAMA which provides as follows:
 “(1) A notice may be given by the
company to any member either personally or by sending it by post to him or to
his registered address, or (if he has no registered address within Nigeria) to
the address, if any, supplied by him to the company for the giving of notice to
him.
 (2) Where a notice is sent by
post, service of the notice shall be deemed to be effected by properly
addressing, pre-paying, and posting a letter containing the notice, and to have
been effected in the case of a notice of a meeting at the expiration of seven
days after the letter containing the same is posted, and in any other case at
the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of
post.”
Effect of Non-compliance with Removal
Procedure
The office of a director is a statutory
office regulated by CAMA in terms of appointment, tenure of office and removal
procedure. It is trite law that where the employment contract of an employee is
regulated by statute, such contract is statutorily flavoured and the employee
enjoys a special status over and above an ordinary staff. In matters of
discipline or dismissal of the employee, the procedure laid down by law must be
strictly followed. Where removal does not follow the procedure, the employee is
entitled to be reinstated to the employment.
It is however debatable if the
above-stated statutory protection of a director’s office can be extended to a
director or managing director whose appointment, powers, duties, remuneration
and tenure of office are regulated by his contract of service. It is debatable
because the combined reading of section 41 (3), section 262 (1) and (6) of CAMA
are to the effect that a director’s removal may be provided otherwise than in
CAMA. Therefore, where removal of a director complies with his contract (and
not the CAMA), the removal ought to be upheld. Any claim for reinstatement
ought to be refused. Unfortunately, the foregoing point was not raised in Longe
v. CBN
thus, leading the Supreme Court to conclude absolutely that all
directors and managing/executive directors of a company can only be removed in
line with section 262 of CAMA and that failure to comply with section 262 of
CAMA nullifies the removal. That will be an issue for another day.
 By; Kayode Omosehin
THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION (NBA) SEAL AND STAMP POLICY: PROSPECTS AND CONSTRAINTS

THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION (NBA) SEAL AND STAMP POLICY: PROSPECTS AND CONSTRAINTS


Credit – Nigeriabar.com
 The
seal and stamp policy is a top-notch one which is essentially aimed at
restoring sanity to the legal profession. After engaging lawyers to prepare
documents, some non-lawyers reproduce the precedents in subsequent transactions
without seeking the lawyers’ approval. There are even instances where clients
would connive with paralegals get precedents of legal agreements and execute
same without the knowledge of the legal practitioner whose name is on the
document.
Also, non- lawyers around our court premises engage in preparing legal
documents. This policy is a commendable one!
In
reaction to the seal and stamp policy, a lawyer on a social media platform
asked whether membership of the NBA is compulsory. My simple response is:
“there is an automatic membership of the NBA upon being called to the Bar”. As
long as one has elected to join and remain within the noble profession, he is a
member and must comply with the regulations set by the body. See Chinwo v Owhonda (2008). Every legal
practitioner is bound by the directive of the Association.
The
Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) is a subsidiary legislation made pursuant
to a statutory enactment. The RPC gives the NBA powers to approve seal and
stamps. There is no doubt that the policy has the force of law and is
therefore, binding on all members of the Association. This analysis would
consider the validity, viability, queries, prospect, constraints and other
attendant issues relating to this policy.

Is the NBA’s directive in compliance
with the RPC?
The
provisions of Rule 10 of the Rules of
professional conduct 2007
make it mandatory for every lawyer to sign and
file only documents which have the seal and stamp of the NBA:
(1)        “A lawyer acting in his capacity as a
legal practitioner, legal officer or adviser of any Governmental department or
ministry or any corporation, shall not sign or file a legal document unless
there is affixed on such documents a seal and stamp approved by the Nigerian
Bar Association”
(2)
       For the purpose of this rule,
“legal documents” shall include pleadings, affidavit, depositions,
applications, instruments, agreements, deeds, letters, memoranda, reports,
legal opinions or any similar documents.”
In
furtherance of this rule, the official release of the NBA clearly states that
from
April 1, 2015, the possession of the new seal and stamp will compulsorily
supersede even the payment of annual practising fee to the NBA by qualified
lawyers who seek to engage in legal practise in Nigeria. From that date, every
document filed by a lawyer
 shall be deemed to be improperly
signed or filed except it is affixed with the unique stamps issued by the NBA
to the lawyer.
The word “lawyer” is
not defined by any law in force. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, defines
a lawyer as “any person licensed to practise law”. This is in effect, has the
same meaning as a legal practitioner. See
Section 24 of the Legal Practitioners Act (LPA)
. 
Can the directive be extended to
lawyers in corporate employment?
The NBA official
release further states that documents covered are pleadings, affidavits,
depositions, applications, instruments, agreements, deeds, letters, memoranda,
reports, legal opinion, and to leave no one in doubtthat it intends to cover
every document, it mentioned ‘any similar document.’While accredited lawyers in
private practice will be given green stamps bearing their unique enrolment
number, their counterparts in public or corporate employment will be assigned a
red version.
Rule 8 of the RPC reads:
(1)        “A lawyer, whilst a servant or in a
salaried employment of any kind, shall not appear as advocate in a court or
judicial tribunal for his employer except where the lawyer is employed as a
legal officer in a government department.”
(2)        A lawyer, whilst a servant or in a
salaried employment, shall not prepare, sign, or frank pleadings, applications,
instruments, contracts, deeds, letters, memoranda, reports, legal opinion or
similar instruments or processes or file any such document for his employer.”
A
careful perusal of the wordings of Rule
8(1) of the RPC
suggests that any lawyer in salaried employment i.e. a
lawyer in corporate employment shall not appear as an advocate, prepare or even
sign any legal document for his employer. The rule is very clear and dismisses
of every ambiguity. To this end, there is a conflict between the directive of
the NBA and the provisions of the enabling legislation. The provision of red
stamps for lawyers in corporate employment is antithetical to Rule 8 of the
RPC.
 

Credit – Premiumtimes.com

Rule 10 (1) of the same RPC 2007
(quoted above) which requires approved seal and stamp on all legal documents
plainly applies to a “lawyer acting in
his capacity as a legal practitioner”
, in this case, lawyers not in
salaried employment, “legal officer or
adviser of any governmental department or Ministry or any corporation…”

which simply means a legal officer or legal adviser of any government
department or government ministry or corporation. The ordinary and grammatical
interpretation of this provision excludes lawyers in corporate employment who
the NBA has now mandated to apply for red seals. This is an express violation
of the provisions of the legislation regulating the conduct of legal
practitioners. Also, corporate governance demands that all correspondence must
emanate from the office of the company secretary which invariably compliments
the position of Rule 8 of the RPC.
If
the NBA does not extend the seal and stamps to lawyers in corporate employment,
it would create more opportunities for those of us in private practice as
against the current trend where in-house counsels retain personal clients and
provide them with legal services which do not require appearing in court or
filing processes. 
Should the stamp and seal be issued in
the name of firms?
The
official release of the Association stating that the seal and stamp are for
individual lawyers is apt and in compliance with Rule 10 which states: “A lawyer” and not “firm of lawyers”. I am yet to see any seal and stamps issued in the
name of law firms and I doubt if the NBA would toe that line despite invitation
by some for seals in the name of their firms.
The
hurdle which any seal and stamp issued in the name of a firm would be unable to
cross is that the definition of a legal practitioner under the LPA allows for
only individual lawyers whose names are on the roll to sign processes. This has
been established by the apex court and followed in a plethora of authorities.
The sweeping effect of the decision of the apex court in Nweke v Okafor is very fresh in our minds. The NBA is therefore,
urged not to consider any application in the name of a firm. 
What is the penalty for non-compliance
with this policy?
While
Rule 10 (3)of the RPC 2007 states
that any document not in compliance with sub-rule (1) shall be deemed not to
have been properly signed or filed, Rule
55
of the RPC reads:
“If a lawyer acts
in contravention of any of the rules or fails to perform any of the duties
imposed by the rules, he shall be guilty of a professional misconduct and
liable to punishment as provided in the Legal Practitioners Act, 1975”
Rule
10 is a specific sanction on the issue of a legal document which violates the
seal and stamp policy while the latter is a general rule applicable to all the
provisions of the rules. It is trite law that where there is a specific
provision and a general provision, the specific takes precedence. 
By
extension, if and when a lawyer contravenes this regulation by either filing a
writ without a seal or seeking to tender a document which does not bear a seal
approved by the NBA, will the court apply the principle in NWEKE V OKAFOR and deems the writ as incurably bad or the documents
inadmissible? These are scenarios which are yet to be tested in court. However,
the principle of substantial justice may not allow the courts to adopt a
similar principle as that laid down in NWEKE
v OKAFOR
.  In any case, the
provisions of section 1(2) of the
Evidence Act 2011 (as amended)
may persuade the court to reject any
document without the approved seal since the RPC is a subsidiary legislation
which has the force of law. 
On
July 30, 2015 an application was challenged in an Ogun State election petition
tribunal panel on the ground that the application did not carry the stamp and
seal approved by the NBA. The applicant argued that the directive of the Chief
Justice of Nigeria (CJN) provides that the courts are to set up guidelines
towards the enforcement of this policy. The tribunal upheld the argument. With
due respect, the reasoning of the tribunal is most untenable in the face of a
subsidiary legislation (the RPC) in force. What mechanism is required to be put
in place by the court or tribunal as the case may be in the enforcement of this
policy? The process merely entails application to the NBA and the seal and
stamp shall be issued by the Association. We can only await a decision on this
issue by a superior court.
Is there a conflict between the RPC 2007 and the Entitlement
to practice as Barristers and Solicitors (Federal Officers) Order
1992?
The provisions of Rule 8 and 10 (1) of the RPC and Rule 1 (2) of the
Entitlement to practice as Barristers and Solicitors (Federal Officers) Order
seem to be stating different things while they both
derive their efficacy from the same principal legislation (the LPA).
While
Rules 8 and 10 of the RPC (quoted
above) state that any legal officer in a government department can appear as an
advocate in a court or tribunal, the latter suggests that only law officers in
the Federal Ministry of Justice shall practice as barristers and solicitors.
Others in the civil service of the Federation shall not be entitled to that
privilege. It reads:
“Any person holding
office in the Civil Service of the Federation, other than law officers in the
Federal Ministry of Justice shall not practice as a barrister or solicitor in
Nigeria while still a holder of that office.”
It
is an established principle that where legislation is specific on a subject and
another is general, the former shall be given priority. It is however,
instructive to note that while the Entitlement
to practice as Barristers and Solicitors (Federal Officers) Order
is a 1992
legislation, the RPC was enacted in 2007. The RPC being a latter legislation
takes precedence and accords more with reason. Support is drawn from the
provisions of Section 144 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) which provides
that a legal officer of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
can represent the Commission at the tribunal or in court. This is unarguably in
consonance with Rules 8 and 10 of the RPC. 
At a time when the legal
profession is not having it smooth,
the
seal and stamp policy for lawyers is a laudable one which is in the interest of
lawyers as it will restore sanity and pride into the profession. It will
prevent sharp practices and impersonation of lawyers by non-lawyers.
However, the
centralization of the scheme has made it difficult for so many lawyers to get
their applications treated within the shortest possible time. The NBA should
consider a decentralization of the scheme and allow branches being
representatives of the national body to approve seal and stamps for their
branch members. 
The
interpretation of Rule 8 of the RPC in clear terms exempts lawyers in salaried
employment i.e. lawyers in corporate employment from preparing or signing legal
documents. In consonance with this provision, the NBA should limit the seal and
stamp to legal practitioners in private practice and law officers in government
departments. 
On a final note, there is the need to also consider the up-and-coming
lawyers in the decisions of the NBA. If the annual
practising fee varies according to the year of call, it is most appropriate
that the same scale be adopted for the seal and stamp policy. This policy can
be subsumed under the annual practicing fee considering its recent upward
review.
By- @TanimolaAnjorin Esq.,
Building Blocks For Successful Lawyer Marketing

Building Blocks For Successful Lawyer Marketing

Note: This post is shared from Legalpedia.com 
How profitable will your firm be if you systematically
planned and implemented legal activities intended to bring potential clients in
the door … that’s marketing! And that doesn’t contravene the law at all!
Our previous Profitable Law Firm (PLF) Series emails have
been showing you WHY you should be marketing your law practice, and that there
is a HOW to market, that is the correct way.

Now it’s time to get into the crux of the PLF Series.
The first thing you need to know and must never forget
is that …
The Tools and Techniques of Great Legal Marketing Change
Over Time, but the Principles NEVER Change. As time goes on, we will be
exposing you to the tools of the trade.’ However, the principles that govern your
use of them will remain the same.
 They are the
foundation on which your ‘Legal Marketing’ efforts rest. Principles are universal.
Focus on the principles. They work. They are tested and proven. This email will
dwell on the first principle you should know.

The # 1 Principle of great legal marketing is:

You (and only you) decide who you want to see coming through that door as your
next client.

Everybody doesn’t need your services. Everybody cannot be your target client. The
ideal client is the one who desires and needs your services and to him/her,
your services are a ‘hot sell’ to them; a perfect fit for their needs and the
reason why they will be willing to go the extra mile to get it from you at all
cost.

Imagine how much easier life will be if you know who they are, where they are
and how to get them.

That’s why the first thing you need to do is…

Identify and Define who your ideal client is. 
I will not leave this to you to figure out how. I will
be giving you pointer questions to help you perform this task of identifying
who is your ideal client. If you are able to successfully think deep and answer
two questions, you have just laid a major stone in the foundation of your law
firm marketing structure.

1. Who is Your Preferred/Choice Customer?

• Who exactly is this customer? Be as specific as possible.
• Identify Demographic Information – age, gender, location,
   income…
• Identify Psychographic Information (a.k.a. their affinities)
  – especially in areas like politics, religion, values, hobbies,
  interests…
• Identify Emotional Information – hopes, dreams, fears,
  and pain. What is that ‘thing’ that keeps them up at night?

2. What is their KEY Problem and the challenges associated with it that you can address or provide a solution?

The easiest way to do this is to fill in the blanks in this statement (representing
your ideal client): “If I could just ________ I will _________”.  For example, say you are a Litigation Lawyer,
one of your client’s problem should be like this:

“If I could just prove my ownership of this property, I will sell it,and
have my peace of mind.



What is their pain and what is the outcome that they desire
to have in solving it? What are the associated pains that go with it and what
are the associated outcomes that go with solving that pain?

How about if these people know and remember (through the right ‘marketing’)
that YOU are trusted,and can address those pains and help them achieve their desired outcome?

What do you think will happen to your practice if you can find such people or
such people can find you easily?

How easy will it be to provide ‘custom tailored’ solutions to address those
particular needs? How valuable will your ‘offer’ be to them?

It is because you know your ideal customer and what they want, you can then
create the perfect offer for them.

The offer will be “IRRESISTIBLE” because, it provides the perfect solution to
help a SPECIFIC type of people achieve their desired goal. Remember, Client
First, Offer Second


After answering the two questions, what do you think you need to do differently
going forward?

Hit the reply button and let’s hear your comments.

To Your Success!
Mayowa Johnson

P.S
Feel free to send your questions on what we have done so far.